OBJECT LOCALISATION DEFICITS IN POSTERIOR CORTICAL ATROPHY AND TYPICAL ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE: TRACKING POSITION, MOVEMENT AND FIXATION PATTERNS WITHIN A SIMULATED REAL-WORLD SETTING

Keir Yong,Amelia M. Carton,Biao Yang,Ian McCarthy,Tatsuto Suzuki,Catherine Holloway,Robin Serougne,Derrick Boampong,Mary Pat Sullivan,Nick Tyler,Sebastian J. Crutch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.561
2016-01-01
Abstract:Dementia friendly design guidelines emphasise the significance of the physical environment in supporting patient autonomy; however, there is limited empirical investigation into this area. Visual characteristics of the environment are of particular interest in the context of dementia-related visual impairment (arising from neurological, not ophthalmological, conditions). Such impairment is diagnostic of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), a clinico-radiological syndrome involving progressive visual dysfunction owing to neurodegeneration of posterior cortical regions. A common complaint in PCA is pronounced difficulty searching for and finding objects, with similar complaints being noted in typical Alzheimer's disease (tAD; Mendez et al., 1990). An environmental variable proposed to particularly undermine object localisation and orientation in dementia is visual clutter. This project investigated factors influencing object localisation in PCA and tAD in a simulated real-world environment. A total of 15 PCA patients, 10 tAD patients and 23 healthy controls participated in a series of tasks involving locating objects in extrapersonal-peripersonal (32 trials) and peripersonal space (36 trials). Participants were asked to pick up target objects under varying conditions of clutter (distractor objects: none, two, five), visual cue (present, absent), starting position and object position. All tasks took place within the UCL Pedestrian Accessibility and Movement Environment Laboratory (PAMELA). Task efficiency was the time taken between trial onset and participants’ first physical contact with the target object. Tracking of gait (inertial measurement units [IMUs]), fixation (Begaze eyetracker), walking paths and body position (dead-reckoning analysis using IMUs; Coda system) was carried out as participants performed each task. PCA and tAD groups were inefficient relative to controls locating and reaching for objects in extrapersonal and peripersonal space. Assessment of walking paths to objects in extrapersonal space revealed tortuous routes for patients both with PCA and tAD. In peripersonal space, poorer object localisation was identified under increased levels of visual clutter in PCA, but not tAD or control participants. PCA patients demonstrated particularly poor performance when locating objects in peripheral vision. Findings outline differential effects of visual clutter by group. Patterns of patient performance, motion and fixation tracking offer insights into the optimal environmental conditions for patients to find objects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?