Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Improper sequencing order of maximal joint and segment velocities has been identified as an important predictor for both throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity.Purpose:To investigate the intrapitcher variation of maximal segment velocities and the relationship to throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity in high school (HS) and professional (PRO) pitchers.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:HS (n = 59) and PRO (n = 338) pitchers, instructed to throw 8 to 12 fastball pitches, were evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Maximal joint and segment velocities were calculated for each pitch, and the standard deviation of the maxima was calculated per pitcher. These standard deviations were used to classify pitchers as "low variance" or "high variance" for each segmental velocity subgroup, "overall low variance" or "overall high variance" based on cumulative segment velocity variation, or "population," with any pitcher eligible to be included in multiple subcategories. Maximal velocities and throwing arm kinetics were compared among the various subgroups.Results:The HS low-variance shoulder internal rotation velocity subgroup (4949 ± 642 deg/s) had significantly lower maximal shoulder internal rotation velocity compared with HS population (5774 ± 1057 deg/s) (P < .001); similar findings were observed for PROs (5269 ± 835 vs 5824 ± 1076 deg/s; P < .001), as well as lower shoulder superior force compared with the PRO population (14.8% ± 8.8% vs 17.8% ± 8.8% body weight; P = .001). The PRO low-variance lead knee extension velocity subgroup had significantly lower maximal lead knee extension velocity (216 ± 135 vs 258 ± 125 deg/s; P = .001) and shoulder distractive force (111.5% ± 14.4% vs 115.6% ± 15.9% body weight; P = .003) compared with the PRO population. The PRO overall low-variance subgroup had significantly lower shoulder distractive force (111.8% ± 14.1% vs 119.6% ± 15.5% body weight; P = .008) and elbow anterior force (40.6% ± 5.0% vs 43.6% ± 6.2% body weight; P = .008) compared with the PRO overall high-variance subgroup.Conclusion:HS and PRO pitchers with low variance for joint and segment velocities achieved significantly lower maximal velocities in the subgroup of interest, while preserving ball velocity. PRO pitchers with overall low variance among multiple maximal joint and segment velocities demonstrated decreased shoulder distractive and elbow anterior force.Clinical Relevance:PRO pitchers with low intrapitch variation in maximal joint and segment velocities may be viewed as kinetically conservative throwers. These pitchers with similarly maintained mechanics between pitches may have an increasingly regimented form that preserves kinetic forces about the throwing arm. The opposite may be true for PRO pitchers with increased variability in segmental velocities during their pitching motion, as they showed increased throwing arm kinetics including shoulder distractive and elbow anterior force compared with the overall low-variance group, theoretically increasing their risk of injury.

Shooting Motion Differences in High School, Collegiate and Professional Men’s Lacrosse Players: 3507 Board #268 May 30, 8

Shooting Motion in High School, Collegiate, and Professional Men's Lacrosse Players.

Position-Specific Shooting Kinematics on Peak Ball Speed in Men’s Lacrosse: 3508 Board #269 May 30, 9

Differences In Arm Motion Timing Characteristics For Basketball Free Throw And Jump Shooting Via A Body-Worn Sensorized Sleeve

Kinematics of Overhead Throwing Motions in Professional Lacrosse and Baseball Players

Kinematics of Shooting in High School and Collegiate Lacrosse Players with and Without Low Back Pain.

Potential Sport Crossover Benefit of Golf Swing to Lacrosse Shot Motion

Identifying Risk Factors for Preexisting or Developing Low Back Pain in Youth, High School, and Collegiate Lacrosse Players Using 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis

Comparison of In-Game Trunk and Upper Extremity Kinematics Between Fastballs, Breaking Balls, and Changeups in NCAA Division I Collegiate Baseball Pitchers

Head Impact Kinematics and Brain Tissue Strains in High School Lacrosse

Relationships among balance, visual search, and lacrosse-shot accuracy

Impact Of Crosse Hold And Lower Body Running Mechanics On Musculoskeletal Pain And Injury In Lacrosse Athletes

Athlete External Loads Across a Collegiate Men's Lacrosse Season

Crosse Use Effects On Running And Drop Jump Mechanics In Male And Female Lacrosse Players: 1041 Board #167 May 27 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM

Kinematic Sequence Differences Between Trained Baseball Players and Untrained Adolescent Individuals

Biomechanical Analysis on Skilled Badminton Players During Take-Off Phase in Forehand Overhead Strokes: A Pilot Study

Kinematic Analysis of Golfer' S Full Swing Motion with Driver

An Analysis of Intrapitch Variation in Joint and Segment Velocities With Throwing Arm Kinetics in High School and Professional Baseball Pitchers

Differences in ACL biomechanical risk factors between field hockey and lacrosse female athletes

Dynamic Functional Ability in Lacrosse Players in Relation to Development of Sport-Related Onset of Musculoskeletal Pain

Kinematic Analysis of 2-Point and 3-Point Jump Shot of Elite Young Male and Female Basketball Players