Research on Preservation Physiology of Blooming Promoter “Jinba” for Cut Chrysanthemum

Cui-li WANG,Yang CUI,Hai-yan MA,Ling ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2014.01.005
2014-01-01
Abstract:“Jinba” cut chrysanthemum was used as experimental material , the forced flowering material ( a) and natural flow-ering material ( b) were treated with the optimized blooming promoter ( A) and the traditional vase -used preservative solution ( B) respectively , the physiological indexes ( such as water balance value , total flavonoids content ) of treated materials were determined during their preservation , and their morphological indexes in each treatment were evaluated with fuzzy quantitative method .The av-erage comprehensive score of the optimized blooming promoter A was 0.28 higher than that of the traditional vase -used preservative solution B, and 0.88 higher than that of CK.The vase life of treatment Ab was 2 d longer than that of treatment Ba .The compre-hensive score of different treatments showed the following order:Ab>Aa>Ba>Bb>CKa >CKb.The water balance value and fresh weight variation rate (75.551%) of treatment Ab were the highest in all treatments .The soluble protein content peak of Ab ap-peared at the latest (on the 20th day), and the chlorophyll content in leaf reached the maximum (0.0716 mg/g) on the 14th day. The optimized blooming promoter A could better improve the content of total flavonoids in petals .The above results showed that the vase preservation effect of the optimized blooming promoter A was better than that of the traditional vase -used preservative solution B, and the former could be used as vase fresh -keeping solution .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?