THE MTT COLORIMETRIC AND ELISA METHODS FOR THE ACTIVITIES ASSAY OF THE RECOMBINANT HUMAN MACROPHAGE COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR(rhM-CSF)

Jie ZHU,Jun-chuan QIN,Dong-mei ZHANG,Rui-qing JIAO,Yu-hui ZANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0469-5097.2000.02.011

2000-01-01

Abstract:The macrophage colony stimulating factor(rhM CSF) is a homodimeric glycoprotein regulating the survival, proliferation and differentiation of monocytes and macrophages. As a new medicine of anti fungi and anti tumor,the rhM CSF may have a wider therapeutic window. The colony forming method is the earliest and an universal activities assay method of rhM CSF,but its use in a large number of quantitative assays has been limited due to several factors, such as taking much time,the complexity of process and unaufomafic. To monitor the preparation of the recombinant human macrophage colony stimulating factor expressed in silkworm larvae, we developed 2 methods for the activities assay of rhM CSF: one is the MTT colorimetric method detecting the activities of rhM CSF on BMM(Bone Marrow Derived Macrophage) cells,which were induced from the C 57 mouse's bone marrow cells(BMC) by incubation with 1?000 CFU/mL rhM CSF;and the other is ELISA method using the monoclonal antibody of rhM CSF to detect rhM CSF.The optimum experimental conditions were studied to increase the sensitivity.The optimum density of BMM cells is 6×10 5 cells/mL,and the optimum incubation time is 96 hours in the MTT method.The optimal concentration of monoclonal antibody of rhM CSF is 300 ng/mL in the ELISA method.Besides the purified,the semi purified and the crude samples were detected in the MTT and ELISA methods. The results obtained from these 2 methods are compared with those obtained from the colony forming method.Several phenomena emerged from this comparison. First,the sensitivity of the MTT method was higher than those of the other two in the purified samples' detection.Secondly,the activity of the semi purified and the crude samples detected in the MTT method was lower than that from the colony forming method.This indicated that there was something unknown restraining the proliferation of the BMM cells in unpurified samples.Finally,the results of different samples detected in the ELISA method were lower than the other two.The reason was probably that the other protein competed the binding site of 96 well plates with rhM CSF.In conclusion, the MTT method is more sensitive and reproduceable than the ELISA method,but ELISA is more specific and faster. It takes only one day to detect samples by using ELISA. And the use of the automatic scanning spectrophotometer in both the MTT and ELISA methods offers major advantages in rapidity,simplicity and reliability. So the 2 methods can be used in a large number of assays or accurate quantitative analyses depending on different samples and requirements.