Direct stenting in coronary artery disease patients with severe ventricular dysfunction

臧红云,韩雅玲,荆全民,王守力,苗志林,王冬梅,王祖禄
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-7236.2002.03.012
2002-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of direct stent implantation in coronary artery disease with severe ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: 189 cases with severe ventricular dysfunction were divided into two groups who underwent stenting without (groupⅠ, n=95) and with (groupⅡ, n=94) predilation. The differences between the two groups in radiation exposure time, procedure time,the amount of dye, cost and heart function were assessed . The heart function was determined by NYHA functional class and LVEF tested by UCG. RESULTS: The radiation exposure time, procedure time, amount of dye and balloon were lower in groupⅠ than those in group Ⅱ(P0.05). There were more patients whose heart function worsened during perioperation in groupⅡ(25 case) than in groupⅠ(2 case), P0.05. LVEF values before and 3 months after the operation were (41±10)% and (54±12)% in groupⅠ( P0.05),and (41±11)% and (52±10)% in group Ⅱ respectively (P0.05); LVID values before and 3 months after the operation were 59±5 mm and 52±5 mm ( P0.05) in groupⅠ,and 59±5 mm and 53±6 mm ( P0.05) in groupⅡ respectively. There was no difference in LVEF and LVID between the two groups 3 months after the operation. CONCLUSION: In coronary heart disease patients with severe ventricular dysfunction, direct stenting without balloon predilation can improve their heart function more significantly than predilation. This technique reduced radiation exposure time, procedure time, and the amount of dye and balloon, and was safe and feasible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?