Abstract:To the Editor: For undertaking an important and challenging investigation, I applaud the authors of the recent publication entitled Infraclavicular Plexus Block: Multiple Injection Versus Single Injection.1 However, I would like to caution readers of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine regarding the ultimate conclusion drawn by the authors that “by performing an infraclavicular block with stimulation of all 3 cords of the brachial plexus, the success rate is higher than when only a single stimulation is used.” While their finding that the success rate increased from 40% to 72.5% with multiple stimulation is supported by the data presented, I believe that their conclusion statement may mislead readers who are not familiar with infraclavicular blockade. As the authors noted in their discussion, the volume of local anesthetic used for their study totaled 30 mL for each patient—either all 30 mL in a single injection or 10 mL injected on each of the 3 brachial plexus cords. The volume is critical for the single-injection infraclavicular block as the cords at the level of the coracoid process surround the axillary artery. Therefore, regardless of the cord(s) initially localized by the stimulating needle, the local anesthetic must extend around to the other side of the axillary artery to contact all 3 cords, and thus the entire brachial plexus. Evidence for this may be found in a recent article, which reported a “doughnut sign” seen by ultrasound when local anesthetic spread around the axillary artery during injection.2 Although a doseresponse study has yet to be published, this theoretically suggests that an inadequate volume of local anesthetic to “surround” the axillary artery may result in a high failure rate. In contrast, the multiple-stimulation technique deposits local anesthetic adjacent to each of the 3 cords, thus theoretically decreasing the total minimum local anesthetic volume required for a successful block. As the authors noted in their discussion, this concept has been demonstrated for femoral nerve blocks involving singleversus multiple-stimulation techniques.3 The dramatic difference between the authors’ singleinjection success rate (40%) and those previously reported (89% to 100%)4-10 was explained by differing definitions of block success and surgical location. However, it is noteworthy that all of these studies reporting a high success rate involved a bolus of 40 to 50 mL of local anesthetic; and one other study using a lower volume of 20 to 30 mL (2-cord multistimulation, 1 patient of 30 received 40 mL) reported a success rate of only 53%.11 I agree with the authors that it is only “speculation” that the “multi-stimulation technique may allow a smaller volume of LA solution,” and that “further studies are required to confirm this speculation.” However, until these studies are published, I believe that the authors’ final conclusion statement regarding the superiority of multipleversus single-stimulation blocks based on their method of using only 30 mL for each single-injection blocks may be misleading. For example, Gale Thompson, M.D., of Virginia Mason Medical Center, demonstrated that when using a paresthesia technique for an axillary block, a total of less than 15 mL of local anesthetic is required (personal communication, Jeffrey Swisher, M.D., February 1998). However, other techniques require far more local anesthetic to be effective.12 Imagine the results of a study comparing the paresthesia and trans-arterial techniques using a total of 15 mL of local anesthetic. If this hypothetical study had been published prior to the wide application of axillary blocks, there is a very good chance that the trans-arterial technique would have been avoided because of its “demonstrated” high failure rate, when in actuality this technique has been shown to provide success rates of up to 99% when an adequate volume of anesthetic is used.13 In the authors’ defense, the issue of local anesthetic volume was mentioned in 2 lines of the discussion, although the very real possibility (probability?) that the differences between technique success rates was due to this factor may not have been addressed adequately so that the majority of readers will understand this critically important variable. When a success rate of 40% is reported, it is easy to come to the conclusion that the technique (single-injection) should be avoided. However, because of others’ success with the single-stimulation technique,4-10 as well as our own at the University of Florida (unpublished data, Ilfeld and Enneking, 2002), I wish to call readers’ attention to this issue.

Histamine as an Abnormal Metabolite in the Rumen of Dairy Cows：Inflammatory Response and Control

Disturbances of Ruminal Microbiota and Liver Inflammation, Mediated by LPS and Histamine, in Dairy Cows Fed a High-Concentrate Diet

Effect of Rumen-undegraded Fat on Milk Yield,Milk Composition and Peripheral Leukocyte Number in Post-parturition Dairy Cows

Effect of Rumen-undegraded Fat on Milk Yield and Plasma Metabolite in Postpartum Dairy Cows

Single- Versus Multiple-Stimulation Infraclavicular Blocks

High-concentrate diet elevates histone lactylation mediated by p300/CBP through the upregulation of lactic acid and induces an inflammatory response in mammary gland of dairy cows

Topical 5 percent acyclovir in polyethylene glycol for herpes simplex labialis. Antiviral effect without clinical benefit.

Diet-induced bacterial immunogens in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows: Impacts on immunity and metabolism

Comparative Analysis of Rumen Microbiota Composition in Dairy Cows with Simple Indigestion and Healthy Cows

Gut Microbiota and Their Role in Health and Metabolic Disease of Dairy Cow

Effect of Dietary Forage Sources on Rumen Microbiota, Rumen Fermentation and Biogenic Amines in Dairy Cows

Lipopolysaccharide derived from the digestive tract activates inflammatory gene expression and inhibits casein synthesis in the mammary glands of lactating dairy cows

Effects of hindgut acidosis on metabolism, inflammation, and production in dairy cows consuming a standard lactation diet.

Rumen microbiome structure and metabolites activity in dairy cows with clinical and subclinical mastitis

Inflammatory response in dairy cows caused by heat stress and biological mechanisms for maintaining homeostasis

Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma

[Chemical denudation rates and carbon dioxide sink in Koxkar glacierised region at the south slope of Mt. Tianshan, China].

Perturbations of plasma metabolites correlated with the rise of rumen endotoxin in dairy cows fed diets rich in easily degradable carbohydrates

Rumen-derived lipopolysaccharide provoked inflammatory injury in the liver of dairy cows fed a high-concentrate diet

Altered rumen microbiome and correlations of the metabolome in heat-stressed dairy cows at different growth stages

The Rumen Microbiota Contributes to the Development of Mastitis in Dairy Cows