Abstract:There has been significant investment in research and development in respect of metal 3D printing in the United States (as well as a number of other jurisdictions). There has been growing conflict over the ownership of intellectual property in respect of metal 3D printing (involving not only patents but also trade secrets and confidential information, as well as contract law and unfair competition). In 2018, Desktop Metal Inc. launched litigation against Markforged Inc. and Matiu Parangi in relation to intellectual property and metal 3D printing in the United States. As well as complaints of patent infringement, Desktop Metal Inc. has alleged that the defendants had engaged in acts of trade secret misappropriation, unfair and deceptive business practices, and breach of contract. Markforged Inc. made various counter-claims of its own. In July 2018, a Federal Jury found that Markforged Inc. did not infringe two patents held by its rival Desktop Metal Inc. Claims of further violations of trade secrets and contract law were also considered. In the end, the dispute was settled, with neither party obtaining an advantage in the litigation. There was further conflict over whether the terms of the settlement in respect of non-disparagement were honored. The parties have also faced further intellectual property conflict. In 2021, Continuous Composites has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Markforged Inc. In 2021, Desktop Metal Inc. brought legal action against SprintRay in Germany. Drawing upon this case study, this paper considers whether metal 3D printing will disrupt patent law, policy, and practice. It also explores the tension between the use of trade secrets in commercial 3D printing (such as in metal 3D Printing), and the open source ethos of the Maker Movement. This paper considers the larger implications of this intellectual property dispute over metal 3D printing for scarcity, regulation, and the abundance society. It also explores the innovation policies of the Biden administration in respect of advanced manufacturing—with a focus upon metal 3D printing and additive manufacturing.

The security Risks and Legal Norms of 3D Printing Technology

A Sober Reflection of the“Universal Machine”--Studies on the Security Risks and Legal Norms of 3D Printing Technology

Intellectual Property in 3D Printing and Nanotechnology

3D PRINTING – AN ANALYSIS OF LIABILITIES AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS WITHIN THE INDIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Blockchain-enabled authentication platform for the protection of 3D printing intellectual property: a conceptual framework study

Ten challenges in 3D printing

The Potential Role of 3D Printing Technology in Enabling Local Entrepreneurship: to What Extent Patent Law Poses a Barrier

Challenges and Resolutions for Copyright Institution of 3D Printing

3D Printing Technology and its Development Trend

Intellectual Property in the Age of 3D Printing

3D Bioprinting: an Emerging Technology Full of Opportunities and Challenges

Metal 3D printing: Patent law, trade secrets, and additive manufacturing

Research on 3D printing service model for innovation, entrepreneurship, and universal applications

Patent law and 3D printing applications in response to COVID‐19: Exceptions to inventor rights

A Critical Review of the Use of 3-D Printing in the Construction Industry

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR 3D BIOPRINTING IN MALAYSIA

Regulatory developments and their impacts to the nano-industry: A case study for nano-additives in 3D printing

Exploring Innovation Ecosystems Across Science, Technology, and Business: A Case of 3D Printing in China

3D Printing: Innovation and Promising

Academic Insights and Perspectives in 3D Printing: A Bibliometric Review

Study on 3D Printing Technology Evolution and its Promotion Strategy from Cultural and Creative Industries: Based on the Patent Knowledge Map Analysis