ALPPS Technique Evolution and Oncological Benefit – Single Center Experience with 24 Cases

J. Li,F. Ewald,E. Achilles,U. Herden,M. Koch,L. Fischer,B. Nashan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.02.139
IF: 3.842
2016-01-01
HPB
Abstract:Background: A technical evolution of ALPPS was accompanied by a better understanding of the importance of patient selection, not only to minimize morbidity and mortality, but also to achieve the most oncological benefit. Methods: The following strategy was applied in 6 surgeons performing ALPPS:1)Considering disease with biliary obstruction as a contraindication;2)minimal invasion for stage 1 operation by applying anterior approach, non-total parenchymal transection;3)A minimal FLR/sTLV of 25% was the threshold for performing the stage 2 operation;4)preemptive antibiotics after each stage of the operation. Results: Among the 24 consecutive cases (CRLM in 16, IHCCA in 4, GBCA in 2, HCC in 2.), the median KGR was 30ml/day. The stage 2 operation was postponed in 6. The median interval between the operations was 15 days. All patients received curative resection (R0 in 22 and R1 in 2). Grade A PHLF was observed in 4. Major complication was found in 5 (20.8%), with only 2 surgical revisions (8.3%). The 90-days mortality was 4.2% (1/24). An early recurrence (till 6 months) was found in 9 while another 6 patients had later recurrence. Further regional or systemic therapy led to 85% overall survival at 1 year. Conclusion: This largest cohort in Germany showed that by standardizing the procedure, morbidity and mortality after ALPPS is even lower than the other major hepatectomy by providing a reasonable FLR. Early recurrence was expected. Possibility of regional or systemic therapy after the recurrence is crucial to ensure a long term survival.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?