Abstract:Ionospheric responses to the initial phases of three geomagnetic storms: 2–5 April 2004, 7–9 November 2004, and 13–16 December 2006, were compared using both ground‐based GPS total electron content (TEC) data and coupled magnetosphere ionosphere thermosphere (CMIT) model simulations. The onset times for these storms all occurred at local daytime in the North American sector. This similarity of onset times and other factors resulted in some common features in their ionospheric response. These common features include (1) enhanced TEC (positive response) at low and middle latitudes in the daytime, (2) depleted TEC (negative response) around the geomagnetic equator in the daytime, (3) a north‐south asymmetry in the positive response as the northern hemispheric response appeared to be more pronounced, and (4) negative response at high latitudes as the storms progressed. The CMIT model captured most of these features. Analysis of model results showed that storm‐time enhancements in the daytime eastward electric field were the primary cause of the observed positive storm effects at low and middle latitudes as well as the negative response around the geomagnetic equator in the daytime. These eastward electric field enhancements were caused by the penetration of high latitude electric fields to low latitudes during southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) periods, when IMF Bz oscillated between southward and northward direction in the initial, shock phase of the storms. Consequently, the ionosphere was lifted up at low and middle latitudes to heights where recombination was weak allowing the plasma to exist for a long period resulting in higher densities. In addition, the CMIT model showed that high‐latitude negative storm responses were related to the enhancements of molecular nitrogen seen in TIMED/Global Ultraviolet Imager observations, whereas the negative storm effects around the geomagnetic equator were not associated with thermospheric composition changes; they were the result of plasma transport processes.

Prolonged Multiple Excitation of Large‐scale Traveling Atmospheric Disturbances (tads) by Successive and Interacting Coronal Mass Ejections

Multiple Transpolar Auroral Arcs Reveal Insight about Coupling Processes in the Earth's Magnetotail.

Multiple Transpolar Auroral Arcs Reveal New Insight about Coupling Processes in the Earth&#8217;s Magnetotail

On the Propagation of a Geoeffective Coronal Mass Ejection during March 15 -- 17, 2015

Persistence of the Long‐Duration Daytime TEC Enhancements at Different Longitudinal Sectors During the August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm

Impact of Major Coronal Mass Ejections on Geospace During 2005 September 7-13

Linkage of Geoeffective Stealth CMEs Associated with the Eruption of Coronal Plasma channel and Jet-Like Structure

Full-Halo Coronal Mass Ejections: Arrival at the Earth

Three-Dimensional Mhd Simulation of Two Coronal Mass Ejections' Propagation and Interaction Using A Successive Magnetized Plasma Blobs Model

Magnetic Mapping Effects of Substorm Currents Leading to Auroral Poleward Expansion and Equatorward Retreat

Was Magnetic Storm the Only Driver of the Long‐Duration Enhancements of Daytime Total Electron Content in the Asian‐Australian Sector Between 7 and 12 September 2017?

Geospace Concussion: Global Reversal of Ionospheric Vertical Plasma Drift in Response to a Sudden Commencement

Multiple Responses of Magnetotail to the Enhancement and Fluctuation of Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure and the Southward Turning of Interplanetary Magnetic Field

Observations and simulations of quasiperiodic ionospheric oscillations and large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances during the December 2006 geomagnetic storm

Thermospheric Density Perturbations Produced by Traveling Atmospheric Disturbances during August 2005 Storm

Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis

Ionospheric Response to the Initial Phase of Geomagnetic Storms: Common Features

An interplanetary cause of large geomagnetic storms: Fast forward shock overtaking preceding magnetic cloud

Correction to “Interplanetary shock‐induced current sheet disturbances leading to auroral activations: THEMIS observations”

Geometric Triangulation of Imaging Observations to Track Coronal Mass Ejections Continuously Out to 1 AU

A Comprehensive View of the 2006 December 13 CME: from the Sun to Interplanetary Space