Abstract:Transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b) was initially discovered by its ability to stimulate immortalized fibroblasts to grow in soft agar, a phenotype associated with expressing cancer-causing genes. Subsequently, it became clear that the ‘‘transforming activity’’ of TGF-b is reversible and can have potent cytostatic effects on normal epithelial cells. TGF-b is now well known for its dual effects in cancer progression; while TGF-b can have suppressive effects on normal and premalignant cells, more advanced cancer cells—frequently exposed to high levels of TGF-b produced by themselves or the stroma—are not only resistant to its cytostatic effects but also stimulated in their invasive and metastatic behavior. TGF-b can do this directly by facilitating epithelial tomesenchymal transition (EMT) and indirectly by acting on its surrounding stroma, promoting angiogenesis and immune evasion (Akhurst and Derynck, 2001). TGF-b signals via cell surface TGF-b type I and type II serine threonine kinase receptors and intracellular SMAD effector proteins. Upon TGF-b receptor activation, SMAD2 and SMAD3 become phosphorylated and form heteromeric complexes with SMAD4. These SMAD complexes can accumulate in the nucleus, where they act as transcriptional regulators. Because SMAD2 does not interact with DNA and the affinity of SMAD3 and SMAD4 for DNA is weak, there is a need for SMADs to partner with other DNAbinding transcription factors. The repertoire of SMAD interaction partners is large and diverse, providing a basis for multi-functionality of TGF-b and its context-dependent effects (Massagué, 2012). TGF-b receptors and SMADs are mutated in certain cancers. Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, activation of proto-oncogenes, and microenvironmental changes can change the tumor suppressive and the tumor promoting activity of the TGF-b receptor/SMAD pathway. Most cancer patients die of metastasis and, because TGF-b is a strong driver of this process, TGF-b pathway inhibiting agents have been developed and tested in clinical trials. However, these compounds inhibit all TGF-b responses and may elicit unwanted effects. Careful selection of patients is warranted and proper biomarkers are needed to select those patients that will benefit from such systemic TGF-b-targeted therapy. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the contextual effects of TGF-b in cancer may allow development of therapeutics selectively inhibiting its pro-oncogenic effects. Previously, Yu and colleagues provided some clues on these mechanisms by demonstrating that the phosphoserine/phosphothreonine-binding protein 14-3-3z, which is overexpressed in more than 40% of breast cancers, can potentiate TGF-b/ SMAD signaling during EMT and breast tumor progression (Lu et al., 2009). 14-33z and the tyrosine kinase receptor ErbB2 were found to cooperate in driving non-invasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) progression to invasive breast ductal carcinoma (IDC). Breast tumors expressing both ErbB2 and 14-3-3z have a higher incidence of metastasis than those expressing only one of them (Lu et al., 2009). In addition, they found 143-3z downregulated the cell cycle inhibitor p27 and activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase, thereby promoting cancer cell proliferation and survival (Rehman et al., 2014 and references therein).

TGF-β Tumor Suppression Through a Lethal EMT

Abstract A30: AKT Activation As a Mechanism of Escape from TGFβ-mediated Lethal EMT

Methyl-CpG-binding Domain 3 Inhibits Epithelial–mesenchymal Transition in Pancreatic Cancer Cells Via TGF-β/Smad Signalling

TGF-β inhibits growth of pancreatic ductal epithelial cells through receptor-mediated activation of Smad proteins

ID1 Mediates Escape from TGF-β Tumor Suppression in Pancreatic Cancer.

Tgf Beta Signaling In Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Smad4 regulates TGF-β1-mediated hedgehog activation to promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells by suppressing Gli1 activity

Abrogation of Transforming Growth Factor- Β Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer

TGFbeta1 represses proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma cells which correlates with Smad4-independent inhibition of ERK activation

The role of TGF-β/SMAD4 signaling in cancer

Cancer Cell Previews 14-3-3 z Turns TGF-b to the Dark Side

Dissecting the role of TGF-beta type I receptor/ALK5 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Smad activation is crucial for both the tumor suppressive and prometastatic function

critical interactions between TGF- signaling/ELF, and E-cadherin/-catenin mediated tumor suppression (vol 25, pg 1871, 2006)

Critical interactions between TGF-|[beta]| signaling|[sol]|ELF, and E-cadherin|[sol]||[beta]|-catenin mediated tumor suppression

Critical Interactions Between TGF- Β Signaling/elf, and E-cadherin/ Β -Catenin Mediated Tumor Suppression

Smad4 Signalling in T Cells is Required for Suppression of Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Gain-of-function p53 mutation acts as a genetic switch for TGF-β signaling-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in intestinal tumors

Abstract 3641: Loss of Smad4 induces SPP1 secretion and immunosuppressive myeloid cell formation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

In Vivo Disruption Of Tgf-Beta Signaling By Smad7 Leads To Premalignant Ductal Lesions In The Pancreas

Tumor-stroma TGF-β1-THBS2 feedback circuit drives pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression via integrin αvβ3/CD36-mediated activation of the MAPK pathway

Biphasic Role of TGF-β in Cancer Progression: From Tumor Suppressor to Tumor Promotor