Phase I Study of High-Dose Ascorbic Acid with Mfolfox6 or FOLFIRI in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer or Gastric Cancer.

Feng Wang,Ming-Ming He,Zi-Xian Wang,Su Li,Ying Jin,Chao Ren,Si-Mei Shi,Bing-Tian Bi,Shuang-Zhen Chen,Zhi-Da Lv,Jia-Jia Hu,Zhi-Qiang Wang,Feng-Hua Wang,De-Shen Wang,Yu-Hong Li,Rui-Hua Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5696-z
IF: 4.638
2019-01-01
BMC Cancer
Abstract:Preclinical studies suggest synergistic effectiveness of ascorbic acid (AA, vitamin C) and cytotoxic agents in gastrointestinal malignancies. This phase 1 study aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of AA combined with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI regimens in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) or gastric cancer (mGC). In the dose-escalation phase, patients received AA (0.2–1.5 g/kg, 3-h infusion, once daily, days 1–3) with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in a 14-day cycle until the MTD was reached. In the speed-expansion phase, AA was administered at the MTD or at 1.5 g/kg if the MTD was not reached at a fixed rate of 0.6, 0.8 or 1 g/min. Pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy were also assessed. Thirty-six patients were enrolled. The MTD was not reached. The RP2D was established as AA at 1.5 g/kg/day, days 1–3, with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was detected during dose escalation. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TRAEs) were sensory neuropathy (50%), nausea (38.9%), vomiting (36.1%) and neutropenia (27.8%). Grade 3–4 TRAEs were neutropenia (13.9%), sensory neuropathy (2.8%), vomiting (2.8%), diarrhea (2.8%) and leukopenia (2.8%). AA exposure was dose-proportional. The objective response rate was 58.3%, and the disease control rate was 95.8%. No difference in efficacy was found between mCRC patients with wild-type RAS/BRAF and mutant RAS or BRAF. The favorable safety profile and preliminary efficacy of AA plus mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI support further evaluation of this combination in mCRC or mGC. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT02969681 .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?