A comparative study of diffusion kurtosis imaging and T2* mapping in quantitative detection of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration

Feifei Zeng,Yunfei Zha,Liang Li,Dong Xing,Wei Gong,Lei Hu,Yang Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06007-z
IF: 2.721
2019-01-01
European Spine Journal
Abstract:Purpose To assess the feasibility of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for diagnosing lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration (IDD) and to compare the potential of DKI and T2* mapping in the diagnosis of early IDD. Methods Sagittal T2WI, DKI, and T2* mapping were performed in 75 subjects with 375 lumbar intervertebral disks at a 3.0-T MRI. DKI-related parameters including mean kurtosis (MK), mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and T2* values were calculated for each disk which was segmented into three regions: nucleus pulposus (NP), anterior annulus fibrosus (AAF), and posterior annulus fibrosus (PAF). Results MK and FA were positively correlated with Pfirrmann grade (all P < 0.001). MD and T2* were negatively correlated with Pfirrmann grade (all P < 0.001) except for T2* value of AAF ( r = 0.087, P > 0.05). MK and FA values increased, while MD and T2* values decreased with age. No statistical significance was found between men and women ( P > 0.05). Cephalic lumbar disks (L1/L2 and L2/L3) got lower MK and FA values than caudal lumbar disks (L4/L5 and L5/S1) (all P < 0.05), while cephalic lumbar disks got higher MD value than caudal lumbar disks (all P < 0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated that MK, MD, and FA showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracies than T2*, especially in NP and PAF. Conclusions DKI can be used to assess human lumbar IDD. And DKI was more sensitive to the quantitative detection of early lumbar IDD than T2* mapping. Graphical abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?