Abstract:Background: Many traditional survival analyses and restricted mean survival time (RMST) based analyses have been proposed for dealing with right censored time-to-event data. It is necessary to sort out the conditions and relationship among these methods for instruction. Comparison between hazard ratio (HR) and RMST in a study may promote appropriate understanding and application of the two effect measures.Method : Traditional survival analyses and RMST-based analyses were integrated into a flowchart and applied for univariable and multivariable analyses, RMST-based analyses included group comparison for difference in RMST, pseudo-value (PV) regressions, inverse probability of censoring probability (IPCW) regressions with group-specific weights and individual weights with homogeneity of censoring mechanism assumption. 4405 osteosarcomas were captured from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program Database. HR and difference in RMST (survival time lost or gain, STL or STG) were considered as effect measures and the effect of all included covariates on overall survival were reported for comparison. The relationship between difference in RMST and HR were explored when proportional hazard (PH) assumption was and was not met, respectively. Results: In group comparison and univariable regressions, using difference in RMST calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods as reference, PV regressions (R2=0.99) and IPCW regressions with group-specific weights (R2=1.00) provided more consistent estimation on difference in RMST than IPCW with individual weights (R2=0.09). In multivariable analysis, age (HR:1.03, STL: 3.86 months), diagnosis in 1970~1980s (HR:1.39 STL:27.49 months), metastasis (HR:4.47, STL: 202 months), surgery (HR:0.58, SLG:35.55 months) and radiation (HR:1.46, SLT:44.65 months) met PH assumption and were main independent factors for overall survival. In both univariable and multivariable variables, a robust negative logarithmic linear relationship between HRs estimated by Cox regression and differences in RMST by pseudo-value regressions was only observed when PH assumption was hold. Conclusion: The flowchart may be intuitive and helpful to instruct appropriate use of RMST based and traditional methods. PH assumption and homogeneity of censoring mechanism assumption will determine the appropriate selection of these method. HR and difference in RMST can be reported comprehensively.

The Relationship Between Hazard Ratio and Median Survival Time

Estimate Risk Difference and Number Needed to Treat in Survival Analysis.

Semi-parametric Regression Model for Survival Data: Graphical Visualization with R.

Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression in survival analysis: statistical standard and guideline of Life Cycle Committee

A Univariable and Multivariable Analysis of Right Censored Time-to-event Data Based on Restricted Mean Survival Time: A Combination with Traditional Survival Methods.

Nomogram for survival analysis in the presence of competing risks.

Parametric Regression Model for Survival Data: Weibull Regression Model As an Example

Statistical Considerations for Evaluating Treatment Effect under Various Non-proportional Hazard Scenarios

Non-collapsibility and Built-in Selection Bias of Hazard Ratio in Randomized Controlled Trials

Meta-Analysis of Time-To-Event Outcomes from Randomized Trials Using Restricted Mean Survival Time: Application to Individual Participant Data

Supplementary Figure S4 from Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation

Supplementary Figure S3 from Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation

The hazard ratio is interpretable as an odds or a probability under the assumption of proportional hazards

Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Marginal Hazard Rates of Paired Survival Times

Survival Analysis in the Presence of Competing Risks

Hazard ratio estimation for two-sample case under interval-censored failure time data.

Survival analysis: Cox proportional hazards model.

Hazard Ratios and Alternative Effect Measures: An Applied Illustration

Analysis of survival data with non-proportional hazards: A comparison of propensity score weighted methods

An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox's proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data