Sa1887 AN INTERNATIONAL STUDY ON THE USE OF PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (POEM) IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL DIVERTICULA: THE FIRST MULTICENTER D-POEM EXPERIENCE
Juliana Yang,Xianhui Zeng,Xianglei Yuan,Yonghong Luo,Chuanhui Li,Kenneth J. Chang,Olaya I. Brewer Gutierrez,Omid Sanaei,Mohamad Dbouk,Nasim Parsa,Lea Fayad,Vivek Kumbhari,Saowonee Ngamruengphong,Vikesh K. Singh,Marcia I. Canto,Anthony N. Kalloo,Bing Hu,Mouen A. Khashab
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.1520
IF: 10.396
2018-01-01
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Abstract:Esophageal diverticula (ED) occur most commonly in the elderly and often result in dysphagia. Treatment can be achieved by open surgery, rigid endoscopy or flexible endoscopy. Although endoscopic septotomy results in symptom improvement in 80-90% of cases, complications occur in 14% of patients and, importantly, symptom recurrence ensues in up to a third of patients. This is believed to be due to incomplete septotomy. A novel technique, diverticular peroral endoscopic myotomy (D-POEM), was recently described in a case report and allows for direct visualization and complete dissection of the septum using principles of submucosal endoscopy (Figure 1). Outcomes of D-POEM for ED are not known. To retrospectively study the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of D-POEM in the management of ED. Technical success is defined as successful completion of the D-POEM. Clinical success is defined as improvement in dysphagia symptom score (0-4, 0=no dysphagia, 4=severe dysphagia). Adverse events were categorized and severity rated per the ASGE lexicon. This is an international, multicenter, retrospective study involving 3 centers (1 Asia, 2 USA). Consecutive patients who underwent D-POEM for ED were included. Patients with ED in the context of achalasia were excluded. A total of 9 patients (75.8±12.7 years, female 66.7%) were included with an average Charleson Comorbidity Index of 3.7±1.7 (range 0—5). None of the patients had prior treatment for ED. One patient was denied surgery due to comorbid conditions. Location of ED was proximal (Zenker's diverticulum, ZD) in 55.6% (5/9), mid-esophagus 11.1% (1/9), and epiphrenic 33.3% (3/9). The mean size of ED was 37.5±16.8mm (10-53mm). The main indication for D-POEM was dysphagia in 77.8% (7/9) and regurgitation in 22.2% (2/9). General anesthesia was used for all cases. The overall technical success rate of D-POEM was 88.9% (8/9). Technical success for ZD was 80% (4/5), 100% (1/1) for mid-esophageal ED, and 100% (3/3) for epiphrenic ED. One case of ZD was technically unsuccessful due to inability to completely expose and transect the septum. There were no adverse events. Mean number of repeat endoscopic procedures was 0.11 (0-1) per patient. The mean procedure time was 70.3±33.8min (25-113min) and mean length of hospital stay was 4.5±4.2 days. Clinical success was achieved in 88.9% (8/9) with a decrease in mean dysphagia score from 2.88 to 0.33 (p=0.0001) during a median follow-up of 52 days (IQR=32-704.5). Endoscopic management of ED using the novel technique of D-POEM appears promising. This first case series on D-POEM suggests that the procedure is feasible, safe, and effective in the management of ED. D-POEM offers the distinct advantage of ensuring a complete septotomy. Larger studies are needed to confirm these intriguing results.