Human Exposure Assessment of Indoor Dust: Importance of Particle Size and Spatial Position
Zhiguo Cao,Gang Yu,Bin Wang,Jun Huang,Shubo Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206470
IF: 11.035
2013-01-01
Environmental Health Perspectives
Abstract:Vol. 121, No. 4 CorrespondenceOpen AccessHuman Exposure Assessment of Indoor Dust: Importance of Particle Size and Spatial Position Zhiguo Cao, Gang Yu, Bin Wang, Jun Huang, and Shubo Deng Zhiguo Cao Search for more papers by this author , Gang Yu Search for more papers by this author , Bin Wang Search for more papers by this author , Jun Huang Search for more papers by this author , and Shubo Deng Search for more papers by this author Published:1 April 2013https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1206470Cited by:2AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit Stapleton et al. (2012) reported thatserum ΣpentaBDEs [sum of pentabrominated diphenyl ethers 47, 99, 100, and 153] were significantly correlated with both handwipe and house dust ΣpentaBDE levels, but were more strongly associated with handwipe levels (r = 0.57; p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.35; p < 0.01).Here we propose an explanation for this phenomenon.Toxicants are not distributed homogeneously in dust according to particle size; particle size distribution of settled dust varies with its spatial position. Thus, distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) will vary with the particle size of dust and the spatial position of settled dust, as well as the location of PBDE sources, such that PBDE levels in settled dust on the floor will be different from those of settled dust above the floor (Björklund et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2010). Because of the spatial position of particles, humans are likely to be exposed only to particles of specific sizes. In addition, exposures to children and adults may be different because particles to which children and adults are exposed often have different spatial position and particle size distribution (Cao et al. 2012; Ruby and Lowney 2012). In addition, the reliability of human exposure assessments may be substantially influenced by between-room and within-room spatial variability of PBDE concentrations in indoor dust (Muenhor and Harrad 2012).As reported in many other studies, Stapleton et al. (2012) reported that for dust sampling, they vacuumed “the equivalent of the entire floor-surface area for the room … by gently drawing the crevice tool across the top of all surfaces,” and they selected fractions < 500 µm for their analysis. Only a few studies have demonstrated that particles > 250 µm are not appropriate for risk assessment of human exposures (Cao et al. 2012). Thus, if the dust samples from the house and from handwipes have different particle size distributions and are from different spatial positions in the indoor environment, it is inevitable that the PBDE levels in handwipes and house dust will be different and the correlation between PBDE in human serum and house dust will be weaker.For human exposure assessment, we propose that indoor dust samples to be analyzed should be from relevant spatial positions and of specific particle size. By improving sampling strategies, we can obtain more accurate results and the correlations between PBDEs in human tissues and indoor dust will be much more accurate. In addition, settled dust should be sampled separately for adults and children.This work was supported by the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 50838002).The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.ReferencesBjörklund J A, Sellström U, de Wit CA, Aune M, Lignell S, Darnerud PO.. 2012. Comparisons of polybrominated diphenyl ether and hexabromocyclododecane concentrations in dust collected with two sampling methods and matched breast milk samples.Indoor Air 22:279-28822212125. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarCao ZG, Yu G, Chen YS, Cao QM, Fiedler H, Deng SBet al.. 2012. Particle size: a missing factor in risk assessment of human exposure to toxic chemicals in settled indoor dust.Environ Int 49:24-3022964460. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarMuenhor D, Harrad S.. 2012. Within-room and within-building temporal and spatial variations in concentrations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in indoor dust.Environ Int 47:23-2722732214. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarRuby MV, Lowney YW. 2012. Selective soil particle adherence to hands: implications for understanding oral exposure to soil contaminants.Environ Sci Technol 46:12759-1277123148503. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarStapleton HM, Eagle S, Sjödin A, Webster TF. 2012. Serum PBDEs in a North Carolina toddler cohort: associations with handwipes, house dust, and socioeconomic variables.Environ Health Perspect 120:1049-105422763040. Link, Google ScholarWu Q, Baek SY, Fang M, Chang YS. 2010. Distribution and fate of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in indoor environments of elementary schools.Indoor Air 20:263-27020573126. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Cao Z, Zhao L, Shi Y, Feng J, Wang S, Zhang Y, Yan G, Zhang X, Wang X, Shen M and Wang Y (2017) PAH contamination in road dust from a moderate city in North China: The significant role of traffic emission, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 10.1080/10807039.2017.1300768, 23:5, (1072-1085), Online publication date: 4-Jul-2017. Cao Z, Xu F, Li W, Sun J, Shen M, Su X, Feng J, Yu G and Covaci A (2015) Seasonal and Particle Size-Dependent Variations of Hexabromocyclododecanes in Settled Dust: Implications for Sampling, Environmental Science & Technology, 10.1021/acs.est.5b01717, 49:18, (11151-11157), Online publication date: 15-Sep-2015. Vol. 121, No. 4 April 2013Metrics About Article Metrics Publication History Originally published1 April 2013Published in print1 April 2013 Financial disclosuresPDF download License information EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. Note to readers with disabilities EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [email protected]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.