Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background& Objectives</h3><p>Although about 80% of COVID‐19 cases are reported to be mild, the remaining 20% of cases often result in a severe disease with the potential of crushing already overstrained health care services. There has been sustainable growth of COVID‐19 cases worldwide since mid‐May 2020. In order to keep tabs on community transmission of COVID‐19 infection screening of the samples from large population is needed which includes asymptomatic/symptomatic individuals along with migrant population. This requires extra resources, man power and time for detection of SARS‐CoV‐2by RT‐PCR. In current scenario pooled sample testingstrategy advocated by ICMR, New Delhiis a new approach which is very promising in resource limited settings. In this study we have evaluated pooled strategy in terms of accurate testing results, utilization of consumables and identification of border line positive cases.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Materials & Methods</h3><p>Between April‐June 2020 we performed COVID‐19 testing by RTPCR from areas with varying prevalence of population referred to COVID laboratory, Dr RMLIMS, Lucknow. In a first step the samples are collated into pools of 5 or 10.These pools are tested by RT‐PCR. Negative Pools were reported as negative whereas positive pools of 5 and 10 are then deconvoluted and each sample is tested individually.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>In the present study, we tested 4620 samples in 462 pools of 10 and 14940 samples in 2990 pools of 5. Among 10 samples pool 61 (13%) pools flagged positive in first step. In second step among 61 pools (610 samples) deconvoluted strategy was followed in which 72 individual samples came positive. Pooled‐sample testing strategy helps saves substantial resources and time during surge testing and enhanced pandemic surveillance. This approach requires around 76% to 93% less tests done in low to moderate prevalence settings and group sizes up to 5‐10 in a population, compared to individual testing.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Pooled‐sample PCR analysis strategies can save substantial resources and time for COVID‐19 mass testing in comparison to individual testing without compromising the result outcome of test. In particular, pooled‐sample approach can facilitate mass screening in early coming stages of COVID‐19 outbreaks, especially in low‐ and middle‐income settings and control the spread by meticulous testing of all risk groups.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p></section>

Determination of Varying Group Sizes for Pooling Procedure.

Informed Pooled Testing with Quantitative Assays

Evaluations of modes of pooling specimens for COVID-19 screened by quantitative PCR and droplet digital PCR

Comparing two sample pooling strategies for SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA detection for efficient screening of COVID‐19

Achieving Maximum Speedup in Multi-level Acceleration for Massive Coronavirus Testing

Group testing as a strategy for the epidemiologic monitoring of COVID-19

Effect of Pooling Samples on the Efficiency of Comparative Studies Using Microarrays.

Online algorithm for assignment of specimens to pooled or individual testing using risk models provides a practical way to increase testing capacity

Pretest estimation in combining probability and non-probability samples

Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Allows for Up to 10-Fold Efficiency Increase Across Realistic Scenarios and Testing Strategies

Pooled testing to isolate infected individuals

A combined efficient design for biomarker data subject to a limit of detection due to measuring instrument sensitivity

Evaluation of sample pooling for diagnosis of COVID‐19 by real time‐PCR: A resource‐saving combat strategy

Estimation of Haplotypes Based on DNA Pooling

Pooling designs with surprisingly high degree of error correction in a finite vector space

New Constructions of One- and Two-Stage Pooling Designs

To pool or not to pool: Accounting for task non-attendance in subgroup analysis

A Study of the Efficiency of Pooling in Haplotype Estimation

Pooling as a strategy for the timely diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths in stool: value and reproducibility

DOPE: D-Optimal Pooling Experimental design with application for SARS-CoV-2 screening

A cost-sensitive decision model for efficient pooled testing in mass surveillance of infectious diseases like COVID-19