Abstract:In this study, we quantify the accuracy of a simple pressure estimation method from 2D snapshot PIV in attached and separated flows. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) offers the possibility to acquire a field of pressure instead of point measurements. Multiple methods may be used to obtain pressure from PIV measurements, however, the current state-of-the-art requires expensive equipment and data processing. As an alternative, we aim to quantify the efficacy of estimating instantaneous pressure from snapshot (non-time resolved) two-dimensional planar PIV (the simplest type of PIV available). To make up for the loss of temporal information, we rely on Taylor’s hypothesis (TH) to replace temporal information with spatial gradients. Application of our approach to high-resolution 2D velocity data of a turbulent boundary layer flow over ribs shows moderate to good agreement with reference pressure measurements in average and fluctuations. To assess the performance of the 2D TH method beyond average and fluctuation statistics, we acquired a time-resolved measurement of the same flow and determined temporal correlation values of the pressure from our method with reference measurements. Overall, the correlation attains good values for all measured locations. For comparison, we also applied two time-resolved approaches, which attained values of correlation similar to our approach. The performance of the 2D TH method is further assessed on 3D time-resolved velocity data for a turbulent boundary layer and compared with 3D methods. The root-mean-square (RMS) pressure fluctuations of the 2D TH, 3D TH and 3D pseudo-Lagrangian methods closely follow the pressure fluctuation distribution from DNS. These observations on the RMS pressure estimates are further supported by similar analysis on synthetic PIV data (based on DNS) of a turbulent channel flow. The values of spatial correlation between the 2D TH method and the DNS pressure fields in this case, are similar to the temporal correlations achieved in the turbulent flow over the ribs. Finally, we discuss the accuracy of instantaneous pressure estimates and provide a rule of thumb to determine regions where the pressure fluctuation estimate from the 2D TH methods is likely to fail.Graphical abstract

GPU-based, Parallel-Line, Omni-Directional Integration of Measured Pressure Gradient Field to Obtain the 3D Pressure Distribution

Spectral decomposition-based fast pressure integration algorithm

An Irrotation Correction on Pressure Gradient and Orthogonal-Path Integration for PIV-based Pressure Reconstruction

A fast, matrix-based method to perform omnidirectional pressure integration

A Velocity Decomposition-Based 3D Optical Flow Method for Accurate Tomo-PIV Measurement

A Guided Filter-Based 3D Hybrid Variational Optical Flow for Accurate Tomographic PIV Measurements

Volumetric Three-Component Velocimetry: a New Tool for 3D Flow Measurement

Error Reduction for Time-Resolved PIV Data Based on Navier–Stokes Equations

Digital Holographic PIV for 3D Flow Measurement

A Triple-Exposure Color PIV Technique for Pressure Reconstruction

Green's Function Integral method for Pressure Reconstruction from Measured Pressure Gradient and the Interpretation of Omnidirectional Integration

Digital In-line Holographic PIV for 3 D Particulate Flow Diagnostics

Divergence-free smoothing for volumetric PIV data

Pressure Reconstruction from the Measured Pressure Gradient Using Gaussian Process Regression

Instantaneous Pressure Determination from Unsteady Velocity Fields Using Adjoint-Based Sequential Data Assimilation

One-shot omnidirectional pressure integration through matrix inversion

Pressure from 2D snapshot PIV

Uncertainty-based pressure field reconstruction from PIV/PTV flow measurements with generalized least-squares