Radiomics features extracted from pre and post-procedural imaging in early prediction of treatment response in patients undergoing Trans arterial Radioembolization (TARE) of Hepatic lesions: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Quality Appraisal Study.

Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari,Tara Srinivas,Arun Kamireddy,Alan Kim,Clifford R. Weiss
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2023.12.029
IF: 6.24
2024-01-14
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Abstract:Introduction Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is one of the most promising therapeutic options for hepatic masses. Radiomics features, which are quantitative numeric features extracted from medical images, are considered to have potential in predicting treatment response in TARE. This article aims to provide meta-analytic evidence and critically appraise the methodology of radiomics studies published in this regard. Methods A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. All relevant articles were retrieved, and the characteristics of the studies were extracted. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics Research (CLEAR) were used to assess the methodologic quality of the studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve in predicting objective response were determined. Results The systematic review included 15 studies. The average RQS of these studies was 11.4 ± 2.1, and the average CLEAR score was 33± 6.7. There was a notable correlation (CC = 0.73) between the two metrics. Adherence to quality measures differed considerably among the studies and even within different components of the same studies. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the radiomics models in predicting complete or partial response were 83.5% (76% - 88.9%, CI95%) and 86.7% (78%-92% CI95%), respectively. Conclusion Radiomics models show great potential in predicting treatment response in TARE of hepatic lesions. However, the heterogeneity seen between the methodologic quality of studies may limit the generalizability of the results. Future initiatives should aim to develop radiomics signatures using multiple external datasets and adhere to quality measures in radiomics methodology
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?