The Effect of Different Neutral Ligands on Photoluminescence and Electroluminescence Properties of Ternary Terbium Complexes
Hao Xin,Mei Shi,Xi Cun Gao,Yan Yi Huang,Ze Liang Gong,Dao Bo Nie,Hong Cao,Zu Qiang Bian,Fu You Li,Chun Hui Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp037816h
2004-01-01
Abstract:Three terbium complexes Tb(tba-PMP)(3)(TPPO) (A), Tb(tba-PMP)(3)(H2O) (B), and Tb(tba-PMP)(3)(Phen) (C) (where tba-PMP, TPPO, and Phen stand for beta-diketone 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-(tert-butylacetyl)-5-pyrazolone, triphenyl phosphine oxide, and 1,10-phenanthroline, respectively) with different neutral ligands were synthesized and characterized, and the mechanism of how the neutral ligands affect photoluminescence (PL) and electroluminescence (EL) properties of terbium complexes was studied. Experiments revealed neutral ligand TPPO and Phen strongly affect the terbium complex PL intensity, TPPO enhanced the PL intensity of complex A, while Phen reduced the PL intensity of complex C compared to that of complex B. Investigation indicated this is caused by the different excited energy levels between tba-PMP, TPPO, and Phen, which were obtained from their phosphorescence spectra measured with their corresponding gadolinium complexes Gd(tba-PMP)(3)(H2O)(EtOH), Gd(TPPO)(2)(NO3)(3), and Gd(Phen)(2)(NO3)(3), Compared to complex B, the energy absorbed by TPPO can be efficiently transferred to tba-PMP and the central ion Tb3+ due to its excited singlet and triplet energy levels matching that of tba-PMP and the D-5(4) energy level of Tb3+, and consequently enhancing the PL intensity of A, while on the contrary, negative energy transfer occurred between Phen and tab-PMP or Tb3+ since the triplet energy level of Phen is lower than that of tba-PMP and the D-5(4) energy level of Tb3+ as well. Experimental results show terbium complex electroluminescence (EL) is greatly dependent on its PL intensity, the performance achieved based on complexes A, B, and C being 9540 cd/m(2) and 7.2 lm/W, 3230 cd/m(2) and 1. 17 lm/W, and 690 cd/m(2) and 0.13 lm/W, respectively, with the power efficiency ratio A:B:C 55:9:1, which was greatly enlarged compared to their PL intensity ratio A:B:C = 2.1:1.3:1.