Effect of Tui Na on Upper Limb Spasticity after Stroke: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Meng Wang,Shouguo Liu,Zhihang Peng,Yi Zhu,Xiaodong Feng,Yihuang Gu,Jianhua Sun,Qiang Tang,Hongxia Chen,Xiaolin Huang,Jun Hu,Wei Chen,Jie Xiang,Chunxiao Wan,Gangqi Fan,Jianhu Lu,Wenguang Xia,Liping Chen,Lihua Wang,Xiao Lu,Jianan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.759
IF: 5.43
2019-01-01
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Abstract:Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Tui Na for treating spasticity of the upper limbs of stroke patients. Design A prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled intervention study. Subjects Stroke patients with upper limb spasticity who were treated between December 2013 and February 2017 in 16 participating institutions in China were randomly assigned to receive either Tui Na plus conventional rehabilitation (Tui Na group, n = 222,) or conventional rehabilitation only (control group, n = 222). Methods Eligible adult patients (aged 18-75 years) were enrolled 1-12 months after stroke and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the two groups. Outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. Muscle tone in the spastic muscles was evaluated using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and the primary endpoint was the change in MAS score over 4 weeks of treatment. Results Among patients who had experienced stroke 1-3 months before treatment, the Tui Na group experienced significantly greater reductions in MAS scores for three muscle groups than did the control group after 4 weeks of treatment. These improvements were sustained at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. However, among patients who suffered from stroke 4-6 months and 7-12 months before treatment, the change in MAS with treatment did not differ significantly between those who did and those who did not receive Tui Na. No Tui Na-related adverse events during treatment were reported the groups. Conclusion Tui Na was effective and safe for alleviating poststroke spasticity within 1-3 months after stroke onset.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?