Abstract:The field of predator eavesdropping concentrates on the detection by a predator or parasite of signals that prey direct at conspecifics, and the subsequent evolution by prey to avoid or lessen such detection. Here, we first point out that signaling prey species are often found in mixed-species moving groups or stationary aggregations, and ask the question of how simultaneous signaling, by members of one species or more, might affect predator eavesdropping behavior and the composition of the groups themselves. The detection risk of prey species will be affected by the other species they associate with, and prey should generally avoid joining a group with more detectable species. Yet prey may select to join other species that are preferred by predators, diluting their own risk of attack, as long as that does not lead to substantially greater detection and thereby increased predation. We next review the evidence that prey grouping and collective responses when attacked can confuse predators, leading to lower capture rates. Evidence for this confusion effect mostly involves visually orienting predators. We then ask if a similar phenomenon could occur when animals in a group simultaneously produce acoustic signals and find relevant evidence for predator confusion under such situations in the literature associated with the "cocktail party effect." As confusion is heightened by similarities among mixed-species group members, this provides a force at ecological or evolutionary timescales to make species that associate in groups, and their signals, more similar to each other. However, heterogeneous mixed-species groups may be favored if species are differentially preferred as prey. We suggest experiments to examine whether the success rates of acoustically orienting predators depend on the group size of their mixed-species prey. More observations on the relative positions of conspecifics and heterospecifics in space, and the temporal association of their signals, will also increase our understanding of the relationship between mixed-species grouping and predator eavesdropping.

Active sensing: Eavesdropping on your neighbor to locate prey

Communication with self, friends and foes in active-sensing animals

Collective sensing in electric fish

Detection and processing of electromagnetic and near-field acoustic signals in elasmobranch fishes

Neural strategies for optimal processing of sensory signals

Action Enhances Acoustic Cues for 3-D Target Localization by Echolocating Bats

An end-to-end model of active electrosensation

Acoustic signaling enables collective perception and control in active matter systems

Acoustic mobbing behaviour: vocal fish responses to predation risk through sound communication

Elephant-nose fish 'see' farther by electric sensing when in groups

Tracking activity patterns of a multispecies community of gymnotiform weakly electric fish in their neotropical habitat without tagging

Visualization of Electric Fields and Associated Behavior in Fish and Other Aquatic Animals

Mathematical modelling of the electric sense of fish: the role of multi-frequency measurements and movement

Active sensing: Silencing the bat midbrain to study echolocation

Active Listening for Spatial Orientation in a Complex Auditory Scene

A study on the effect of different manners in active underwater electrolocation based on direct current excitation

The overlapping roles of the inner ear and lateral line: the active space of dipole source detection

A Neural Model Of Electrosensory System For Detection Of Position And Moving Direction Of An Object In Electrolocation

Why the brown ghost chirps at night

Predator Eavesdropping in a Mixed-Species Environment: How Prey Species May Use Grouping, Confusion, and the Cocktail Party Effect to Reduce Predator Detection

Application of reduced sensor movement sequences as a precursor for search area partitioning and a selection of discrete EEV contour-ring fragments for active electrolocation