Abstract:Background Hypotension due to the induction of sedation with dexmedetomidine infusion may be harmful in critically ill patients. Changes in pulse pressure induced by the passive leg raising test (PLR-ΔPP) as marker of fluid responsiveness, assessed prior to sedation, may predict hemodynamic changes. The present study was to investigate the power of the PLR test in critically ill patients in predicting hypotension induced by the induction of dexmedetomidine sedation. Methods Fluid responsiveness was estimated by a passive leg raising (PLR) test before dexmedetomidine sedation. Patients were assigned to either the “Nonresponders” or “Responders” group according to their hemodynamic responses to the PLR test (“Nonresponders”, PLR-ΔPP <10.3%; “Responders”, PLR-ΔPP ≥10.3%). Sedation was performed with a dexmedetomidine infusion (0.5 μg/kg over a 10-minute loading period, then 0.2-0.7 μg·kg-1·h-1) and titrated to maintain the target Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) score in the range of −2 to −1 and the bispectral index value in the range of 60 to 75. Radial artery pulse pressure, heart rate (HR), and central venous pressure (CVP) were measured at each phase of the study procedure. Hemodynamic fluctuations during the use of dexmedetomidine sedation were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Fifty patients had a median (25%-75% interquartile range) of 71 (61-78) years old were studied. At baseline, 39 of the 50 patients were “Nonresponders” and 11 were “Responders”. Following dexmedetomidine sedation, patients classified as “Responders” had a significantly greater systolic blood pressure decrease during the induction of dexmedetomidine sedation than the “Nonresponders” ((−26.3 ± 6.8)% vs. (−11.8 ± 8.5)%, P <0.001). In addition, the “Responders” group required significantly more fluid boluses (8 vs. 3; P <0.001) and vasopressors (2 vs. 0; P <0.05) than the “Nonresponders” group to restore blood pressure. Finally, PLR-ΔPP was positively correlated with changes in systolic blood pressure (PLR-ΔSBP) (r 2 = 0.576; P <0.001) and significantly correlated with dexmedetomidine infusion-induced changes in SBP (r 2=0.202; P <0.05). AUC for PLR-ΔPP was 0.84 (95%CI 0.71-0.93). PLR-ΔPP predicted hypotension with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 92%. Conclusions The fluid responsiveness assessment pre-sedation was found to predict blood pressure fluctuation during the induction of dexmedetomidine sedation. The PLR test conducted prior to sedation may be a useful tool to identify patients with a high risk of hemodynamic events and may be used to indicate the need for prophylactic treatment.

Assessment of sedation by automated pupillometry in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study

EOG Elicited by Rhythmic&nbsp;Auditory Predicts the Depth of Sedation During Sevoflurane Anesthesia

The Depth of Anesthesia under Sevoflurane Can Be Monitored Based on Calling Names Language Paradigm and Ag/AgCl Electrooculogram Electrode

Cerebral oximetry monitoring using near-infrared spectroscopy during adult procedural sedation: a preliminary study

Spectral entropy as a monitor of depth of propofol induced sedation

Quantitative Pupillometry As a Predictor of Pediatric Postoperative Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression.

Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Electroencephalogram Parameters for Monitoring the Depth of Sedation During Remimazolam Target-Controlled Infusion

Sedation assessment in a mobile intensive care unit: a prospective pilot-study on the relation of clinical sedation scales and the bispectral index

Automated Quantitative Pupillometry in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Changes in the Rapidly Extracted Auditory Evoked Potentials Index and the Bispectral Index During Sedation Induced by Propofol or Midazolam under Epidural Block

Quantitative electroencephalographic analysis as a tool for predicting the depth of sedation of sedation induced by propofol, midazolam and ketamine

Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol Sedation ocirculation After Cardiac Surgery : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bispectral Index versus the University of Michigan Sedation Scale in assessing sedation depth during pediatric drug-induced sleep endoscopy

Utilization of NIRS Monitor to Compare the Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Critically ill Patients with Sepsis- A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Changes in Arterial Blood Pressure Induced by Passive Leg Raising Predict Hypotension During the Induction of Sedation in Critically Ill Patients Without Severe Cardiac Dysfunction

Investigation on sedation level and influencing factors in postoperative patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU

Neuromonitoring of delirium with quantitative pupillometry in sedated mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

Effect of sedation level on the prevalence of delirium when assessed with CAM-ICU and ICDSC

Level of sedation in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Recognizing blood pressure patterns in sedated critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation by spectral clustering

Relationship between the patient state index and sedation scale during dexmedetomidine sedation during spinal anesthesia