Abstract:Explainable natural language inference aims to provide a mechanism to produce explanatory (abductive) inference chains which ground claims to their supporting premises. A recent corpus called EntailmentBank strives to advance this task by explaining the answer to a question using an entailment tree \cite{dalvi2021explaining}. They employ the T5 model to directly generate the tree, which can explain how the answer is inferred. However, it lacks the ability to explain and control the generation of intermediate steps, which is crucial for the multi-hop inference process. % One recent corpus, EntailmentBank, aims to push this task forward by explaining an answer to a question according to an entailment tree \cite{dalvi2021explaining}. They employ T5 to generate the tree directly, which can explain how the answer is inferred but cannot explain how the intermediate is generated, which is essential to the multi-hop inference process. In this work, we focus on proposing a controlled natural language inference architecture for multi-premise explanatory inference. To improve control and enable explanatory analysis over the generation, we define lexical inference types based on Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) graph and modify the architecture of T5 to learn a latent sentence representation (T5 bottleneck) conditioned on said type information. We also deliver a dataset of approximately 5000 annotated explanatory inference steps, with well-grounded lexical-symbolic operations. Experimental results indicate that the inference typing induced at the T5 bottleneck can help T5 to generate a conclusion under explicit control.

Natural Language Inference from Multiple Premises

Natural Language Deduction with Incomplete Information

Premise-based Multimodal Reasoning: Conditional Inference on Joint Textual and Visual Clues

Generating Natural Language Inference Chains

Natural Language Inference Using Lstm Model With Sentence Fusion

Are Natural Language Inference Models IMPPRESsive? Learning IMPlicature and PRESupposition

Are Machines Better at Complex Reasoning? Unveiling Human-Machine Inference Gaps in Entailment Verification

A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference

A Study of the State of the Art Approaches and Datasets for Multilingual Natural Language Inference

Context-Aware Tree-Based Convolutional Neural Networks for Natural Language Inference.

Natural Language Inference in Context -- Investigating Contextual Reasoning over Long Texts

Natural Language Inference Improves Compositionality in Vision-Language Models

Towards Controllable Natural Language Inference through Lexical Inference Types

AMR4NLI: Interpretable and robust NLI measures from semantic graphs

Natural Language Inference by Tree-Based Convolution and Heuristic Matching

Simple Linguistic Inferences of Large Language Models (LLMs): Blind Spots and Blinds

A Multi-Modal Context Reasoning Approach for Conditional Inference on Joint Textual and Visual Clues

Multi-Perspective Inferrer: Reasoning Sentences Relationship from Holistic Perspective

Identification of Entailment and Contradiction Relations between Natural Language Sentences: A Neurosymbolic Approach

ConjNLI: Natural Language Inference Over Conjunctive Sentences

Asking Crowdworkers to Write Entailment Examples: The Best of Bad Options