Tuberculosis case fatality is higher in male than female patients in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stephanie Pape,Sudip Jung Karki,Torben Heinsohn,Iris Brandes,Marie-Luise Dierks,Berit Lange

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02206-z

2024-03-23

Infection

Abstract:Abstract Purpose Epidemiological TB data indicate differences in infection prevalence, progression rates, and clinical disease incidence between sexes. In contrast, evidence on sex-specific differential (post) TB case fatality in Europe has not been synthesized systematically. Methods We searched electronic databases and grey literature up to December 2020 for studies reporting sex-stratified TB death data for Europe. The JBI critical appraisal tools served for bias risk assessment and subgroup analyses for studying heterogeneity. Random-effects models meta-analyses enabled estimating pooled relative risks of sex-associated TB fatality. Considering associations of comorbidities and risk factors on fatality differences, we applied relative risk meta-regression. Results Based on 17,400 records screened, 117 studies entered quantitative analyses. Seventy-five studies providing absolute participant data with moderate quality and limited sex stratification reported 33 to 235,000 TB cases and 7 to 27,108 deaths. The pooled male-to-female TB fatality risk ratio was 1.4 [1.3–1.5]. Heterogeneity was high between studies and subgroups. Study time, concurrent comorbidities (e.g., HIV, diabetes, cancers), and mean participant ages showed no effect modification. We identified higher male TB fatality in studies with higher homelessness (coefficient 3.18, 95% CI [-0.59 to 6.94], p- value 0.10) and lower migrants proportion (coefficient − 0.24, 95% CI [− 0.5 to 0.04], p -value 0.09). Conclusion We found 30–50% higher TB case fatality for males in Europe. Except for homelessness, migration, and a trend for some comorbidities, assessing effect modification could not reduce our meta-analysis’ high heterogeneity. Public health authorities should take heed of this higher risk of dying in male patients’ treatment services.

infectious diseases

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the specific situation of the mortality difference between male and female tuberculosis (TB) patients in Europe and its potential influencing factors. Specifically, through systematic review and meta - analysis, the researchers aimed to answer the following core questions:

1. **Gender difference**: In Europe, is the mortality rate of male tuberculosis patients higher than that of female patients? If there is a difference, how large is it?
2. **Influencing factors**: What factors may affect this gender difference, such as socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, population characteristics, etc.?
3. **Regional and temporal changes**: Are there significant changes in this gender difference in different regions and time periods?

### Research background
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most common bacterial infectious diseases in the world and also one of the main causes of death due to a single infectious disease in humans. Although a large number of studies have shown that the incidence and mortality of tuberculosis in men are generally higher than those in women, these studies are mainly concentrated on a global scale and lack a systematic analysis of the European region. Therefore, this paper uses systematic review and meta - analysis methods to discuss in detail the differences in the mortality rates of male and female tuberculosis patients in Europe and their potential influencing factors.

### Research methods
1. **Literature search**: The researchers searched for relevant literature as of December 2020 in multiple databases, including Medline, Pubmed, Embase, the Global Health database, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature.
2. **Inclusion criteria**: The included studies need to report gender - stratified tuberculosis death data in the European region and be able to provide sufficient information to calculate the relative risk ratio.
3. **Data analysis**: A random - effects model was used for meta - analysis to calculate the risk ratio (RR) of tuberculosis mortality between men and women. At the same time, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were carried out to evaluate the influence of different study designs, regions, and time periods.

### Main findings
1. **Overall difference**: Based on the data from 75 studies, the mortality rate of male tuberculosis patients was significantly higher than that of female patients, with a risk ratio of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3 - 1.5).
2. **Influencing factors**:
- **Proportion of homeless people**: The higher the proportion of homeless people in the study, the higher the risk ratio of male tuberculosis mortality (coefficient 3.18, 95% CI: [- 0.59 to 6.94], p - value 0.10).
- **Proportion of immigrants**: The lower the proportion of immigrants in the study, the higher the risk ratio of male tuberculosis mortality (coefficient - 0.24, 95% CI: [- 0.5 to 0.04], p - value 0.09).
- **Comorbidities**: The presence of certain comorbidities (such as diabetes, hepatitis / cirrhosis, etc.) may reduce the risk ratio of male tuberculosis mortality.

### Conclusion
The research results show that in the European region, the mortality rate of male tuberculosis patients is significantly higher than that of female patients, with a risk ratio of approximately 1.4. Although some socioeconomic factors (such as the proportion of homeless people and the proportion of immigrants) have a certain impact on this gender difference, most other factors fail to significantly change this conclusion. Public health activities should pay special attention to the treatment services for male tuberculosis patients to reduce their higher death risk.

### Formula display
- **Risk ratio (RR)**:
\[
\text{RR}=\frac{\text{Male mortality rate}}{\text{Female mortality rate}}
\]
- **Confidence interval (CI)**:
\[
\text{95% CI}=\left(\exp\left(\ln(\text{RR})- 1.96\times\text{SE}\right),\exp\left(\ln(\text{RR})+ 1.96\times\text{SE}\right)\right)
\]
where \(\text{SE}\) is the standard error of the log - risk ratio.

I hope this information can help you better understand the core content and main findings of this paper. If you have any further questions or need more detailed explanations, please feel free to let me know.