Identification of immune-related biomarkers for intracerebral hemorrhage diagnosis based on RNA sequencing and machine learning
Congxia Bai,Xinran Liu,Fengjuan Wang,Yingying Sun,Jing Wang,Jing Liu,Xiaoyan Hao,Lei Zhou,Yu Yuan,Jiayun Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1421942
2024-08-30
Abstract:Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a severe stroke subtype with high morbidity, disability, and mortality rates. Currently, no biomarkers for ICH are available for use in clinical practice. We aimed to explore the roles of RNAs in ICH pathogenesis and identify potential diagnostic biomarkers. Methods: We collected 233 individual blood samples from two independent cohorts, including 64 patients with ICH, 59 patients with ischemic stroke (IS), 60 patients with hypertension (HTN) and 50 healthy controls (CTRL) for RNA sequencing. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) were performed to identify ICH-specific modules. The immune cell composition was evaluated with ImmuneCellAI. Multiple machine learning algorithms to select potential biomarkers for ICH diagnosis, and further validated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the signature for ICH. Finally, we generated M1 and M2 macrophages to investigate the expression of candidate genes. Results: In both cohorts, 519 mRNAs and 131 lncRNAs were consistently significantly differentially expressed between ICH patients and HTN controls. Gene function analysis suggested that immune system processes may be involved in ICH pathology. ImmuneCellAI analysis revealed that the abundances of 11 immune cell types were altered after ICH in both cohorts. WGCNA and GSEA identified 18 immune-related DEGs. Multiple algorithms identified an RNA panel (CKAP4, BCL6, TLR8) with high diagnostic value for discriminating ICH patients from HTN controls, CTRLs and IS patients (AUCs: 0.93, 0.95 and 0.82; sensitivities: 81.3%, 84.4% and 75%; specificities: 100%, 96% and 79.7%, respectively). Additionally, CKAP4 and TLR8 mRNA and protein levels decreased in RAW264.7 M1 macrophages and increased in RAW264.7 M2 macrophages, while BCL6 expression increased in M1 macrophages but not in M2 macrophages, which may provide potential therapeutic targets for ICH. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the expression levels of lncRNAs and mRNAs are associated with ICH, and an RNA panel (CKAP4, BCL6, TLR8) was developed as a potential diagnostic tool for distinguishing ICH from IS and controls, which could provide useful insight into ICH diagnosis and pathogenesis.