Treatment Patterns in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in China: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Database Study

Chunping Wang,Yue Gao,Lifeng Zhu,Min Huang,Yin Wu,Jianwei Xuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.05.003
IF: 3.637
2019-08-01
Clinical Therapeutics
Abstract:<h3>Purpose</h3><p>The objectives of this study were to examine the patterns of antihyperglycemic drug (AHD) therapy among patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the general Chinese population, stratified by initial hemoglobin (Hb) A<sub>1c</sub> level, and to assess whether treatment patterns are consistent with the recommendations published in the China Diabetes Society's clinical treatment guideline.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective database analysis was conducted, and data were obtained from the SuValue database. Prescribing patterns for diabetes treatments were determined from data obtained from the Nanhai District-based electronic medical records database, a subset of the SuValue database. Data from patients newly diagnosed with T2DM who also had at least 2 prescriptions for AHD medications after diagnosis and at least 1 HbA<sub>1c</sub> test result during the 12 months prior to AHD treatment initiation, between January 1, 2004, and July 22, 2018, were included in the analysis. ANOVA, χ<sup>2</sup> test, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to examine differences between 4 initial-HbA<sub>1c</sub> groups (&lt;7%, 7%–&lt;8%, 8%–&lt;9%, and ≥9%).</p><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 4712 patients were included, with women accounting for 47.8%; the mean age (SD) of the study population was 56.44 (12.57) years. Men were more likely to have had a higher HbA<sub>1c</sub> level at initial AHD treatment (<em>P</em> 1c level of &lt;7%; metformin combination (31.7%), in patients with an HbA<sub>1c</sub> level of 7%–&lt;8%; and insulin-containing treatment, in patients with HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels of 8%–&lt;9% (28.1%) and ≥9% (38.4%). Insulin-including treatment was more commonly prescribed than was metformin combination in patients with an initial HbA<sub>1c</sub> level of ≥8% after initial treatment. In third- and fourth-line treatments, patients with an HbA<sub>1c</sub> level of ≥8% more prevalently were prescribed metformin combination and insulin-including treatment, while metformin combination and "other" treatment were more generally prescribed in patients with an HbA<sub>1c</sub> level of ≤8%. However, 8.8% of patients with an HbA<sub>1c</sub> level of &lt;7% were prescribed insulin-including treatment as first-line therapy. In all lines of treatment, the percentages of patients prescribed insulin were increased with initial HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels. A similar pattern was seen with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors after first-line treatment. Overall, the median time to treatment switch was shorter than 3 months.</p><h3>Implications</h3><p>The findings from the present study depict a comprehensive overview of AHD-treatment patterns in patients stratified by HbA<sub>1c</sub> level. The current treatment practices observed were inconsistent the published guideline, in terms of recommendations on metformin monotherapy and insulin use in first-line therapy. (<em>Clin Ther</em>. 2019;41:XXX–XXX) © 2019 Elsevier Inc.</p>
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?