Comparison of Xrn1 and Rat1 5′ → 3′ exoribonucleases in budding yeast supports the specific role of Xrn1 in cotranslational mRNA decay
José E. Pérez‐Ortín,Antonio Jordán‐Pla,Yujie Zhang,Jorge Moreno‐García,Claudio Bassot,Marina Barba‐Aliaga,Leire de Campos‐Mata,Mordechai Choder,Juana Díez,Ilaria Piazza,Vicent Pelechano,José García‐Martínez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3968
IF: 3.325
2024-06-16
Yeast
Abstract:cRat1 can partially restore the cell volume, mRNA stability, proliferation rate, and 5′ → 3′ decay alterations that characterize xrn1Δ cells. In particular, cRat1 is not a good substitute for Xrn1, for not only initiating 5′ → 3′ decay but also for following the ribosome position during cotranslational mRNA decay. The use of the AlphaFold prediction of a cRat1–ribosome complex and the sequence conservation between cRat1 and Xrn1 suggest that the tight interaction with the ribosome observed for Xrn1 is not maintained in cRat1. It seems that the two paralogs acquire specific features to make functional partitioning beneficial. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and most eukaryotes carry two 5′ → 3′ exoribonuclease paralogs. In yeast, they are called Xrn1, which shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, and executes major cytoplasmic messenger RNA (mRNA) decay, and Rat1, which carries a strong nuclear localization sequence (NLS) and localizes to the nucleus. Xrn1 is 30% identical to Rat1 but has an extra ~500 amino acids C‐terminal extension. In the cytoplasm, Xrn1 can degrade decapped mRNAs during the last round of translation by ribosomes, a process referred to as "cotranslational mRNA decay." The division of labor between the two enzymes is still enigmatic and serves as a paradigm for the subfunctionalization of many other paralogs. Here we show that Rat1 is capable of functioning in cytoplasmic mRNA decay, provided that Rat1 remains cytoplasmic due to its NLS disruption (cRat1). This indicates that the physical segregation of the two paralogs plays roles in their specific functions. However, reversing segregation is not sufficient to fully complement the Xrn1 function. Specifically, cRat1 can partially restore the cell volume, mRNA stability, the proliferation rate, and 5′ → 3′ decay alterations that characterize xrn1Δ cells. Nevertheless, cotranslational decay is only slightly complemented by cRat1. The use of the AlphaFold prediction for cRat1 and its subsequent docking with the ribosome complex and the sequence conservation between cRat1 and Xrn1 suggest that the tight interaction with the ribosome observed for Xrn1 is not maintained in cRat1. Adding the Xrn1 C‐terminal domain to Rat1 does not improve phenotypes, which indicates that lack of the C‐terminal is not responsible for partial complementation. Overall, during evolution, it appears that the two paralogs have acquired specific characteristics to make functional partitioning beneficial.
microbiology,biochemistry & molecular biology,mycology,biotechnology & applied microbiology