Abstract:Objectives To evaluate the accuracy in lesion detection and size assessment of Unenhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging combined with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (UE-MRI+DBT) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI), in women with known breast cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 84 patients with histological diagnosis of breast cancer, who underwent MRI on a 3T scanner and DBT over 2018-2019, in our Institution. Two radiologists, with 15 and 7 years of experience in breast imaging respectively, reviewed DCE-MRI and UE-MRI (including DWI and T2-w) + DBT images in separate reading sections, unaware of the final histological examination. DCE-MRI and UE-MRI+DBT sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy were calculated, using histology as the gold standard. Spearman correlation and regression analyses were performed to evaluate lesion size agreement between DCE-MRI vs Histology, UE-MRI+DBT vs Histology, and DCE-MRI vs UE-MRI+DBT. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using Cohen’s κ coefficient. McNemar test was used to identify differences in terms of detection rate between the two methodological approaches. Spearman’s correlation analysis was also performed to evaluate the correlation between ADC values and histological features. Results 109 lesions were confirmed on histological examination. DCE-MRI showed high sensitivity (100% Reader 1, 98% Reader 2), good PPV (89% Reader 1, 90% Reader 2) and accuracy (90% for both readers). UE-MRI+DBT showed 97% sensitivity, 91% PPV and 92% accuracy, for both readers. Lesion size Spearman coefficient were 0.94 (Reader 1) and 0.91 (Reader 2) for DCE-MRI vs Histology; 0.91 (Reader 1) and 0.90 (Reader 2) for UE-MRI+DBT vs Histology (p-value <0.001). DCE-MRI vs UE-MRI+DBT regression coefficient was 0.96 for Reader 1 and 0.94 for Reader 2. Inter-reader agreement was 0.79 for DCE-MRI and 0.94 for UE-MRI+DBT. McNemar test did not show a statistically significant difference between DCE-MRI and UE-MRI+DBT (McNemar test p-value >0.05). Spearman analyses showed an inverse correlation between ADC values and histological grade (p-value <0.001). Conclusions DCE-MRI was the most sensitive imaging technique in breast cancer preoperative staging. However, UE-MRI+DBT demonstrated good sensitivity and accuracy in lesion detection and tumor size assessment. Thus, UE-MRI could be a valid alternative when patients have already performed DBT.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T MR in Staging of Uterine Cervical Carcinoma

Application of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Uterus Cervical Carcinoma

Comparison Of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With T2-Weighted Imaging For Preoperative Staging Of Early Endometrial Carcinoma

Endometrial cancer: preoperative staging using three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3.0 T: a prospective comparative study

Evaluation of multi-parameter MRI in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma

Assessment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma

The Accuracy of Arterial Phase of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Cervical Stromal Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma

&Lt;p>impact of Pelvic MRI in Routine Clinical Practice on Staging of IB1&ndash;IIA2 Cervical Cancer</p>

Staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Comparison of Imaging Features and Diagnostic Values of MRI, CT and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Carcinoma Staging

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pretreatment Evaluation of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

Diagnostic Imaging Performance of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Uterine Cervical Cancer

Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Staging of Endometrial Cancer

The Value of MRI in Diagnosis and Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma

Application Value of 3D Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements with Sensing Technology for Diagnosis and Staging of Endometrial Cancer (Preprint)

Preoperative Staging in Breast Cancer: Intraindividual Comparison of Unenhanced MRI Combined With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI

Diagnostic efficiency of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI alone, and SUV and ADC values in staging of primary uterine cervical cancer

Study of MRI in the Preoperative Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma

Preliminarily discuss the value of magnetic resonance imaging combined transvaginal ul-trasonography for evaluating the patient with early-stage cervical cancer

Application of 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Endometrial Cancer

Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Staging Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Comparison with Surgical Staging