Abstract:OBJECTIVE To disscuss the therapeutic method of the postoperative infection after hip arthroplasty and compare the results of one-stage revision and two-stage revision. METHODS From January 1999 to December 2005, 15 cases of infection after hip arthroplasty were treated, including 10 males and 5 females, with a mean age of 63 years (54-71 years). The locations were left hip in 8 cases and right hip in 7 cases. The first operation was hip prosthesis replacement in 6 cases and tatol hip arthroplasty in 9 cases. Infection occurred after 1 month in 6 cases and after 6 months in 9 cases. The preoperative temperature and ruting blood test were normal, the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 61 mm/h (34-80 mm/h), mean C-reactive protein (CRP) was 11.7 mg/L (5.4-21.0 mg/L). The mean Harris score was 33 (25-40). The X-ray films showed that periosteal reaction, osteolysis and loosening of prosthesis occurred. The time from the first operation to revision operation was 1-41 months (mean 7.3 months). The results of bacterial culture were positive in 11 cases. One-stage revision was performed in 10 cases, two-stage revision was performed in 5 cases. RESULTS Of 15 cases, 6 were classified as early postoperative infection, 9 cases as late chonic infection. The microorganism cultures results of joint aspiration or pus in sinus were positive in 11 cases and negative in 4 cases before operation and during operation; 8 had staphylococcus epidermids infection, 2 escherichia coli infection and 1 staphylococcus aureus infection. Incision of revision operation healed by first intention. No re-infection, swelling and tenderness occurred after 19 months (12-37 months) of follow-up. Pain of hip joint disappeared in 14 cases, and only 1 case had mild pain when walking. ESR and CRP after operation decreased to normal range. The mean Harris score increased significantly to 84.2 (79-92) after revision, showing significant difference when compared with that before operation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION For postoperative infection after total hip arthroplasty, it is still possible to have satisfactory clinical outcome by one-stage or two-stage revision as long as clear diaglosis and correct treatment can made.

The Use of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in 2-Stage Reconstruction of the Hip for Infection.

Partial Two?stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Partial Two-Stage Exchange: an Alternative Method for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Outcome of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Two-Stage Revision of Periprosthetic Hip Infection

Management of the infected total hip or knee arthroplasty with two-staged revisions

Two-stage Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Chronic Infection after the Internal Fixation of the Proximal Femoral Fracture

The Clinical and Radiological Analysis after Removal of Solidly Fixed Femoral Implants by Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy During Hip Revision

Successful Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Impact of Timing on Eradication of Infection

[Cementless Two-Staged Total Hip Arthroplasty for Chronic Periprosthetic Infection].

Treatment of Comminuted Trochanteric Fractures and Non-Union of Trochanteric Osteotomy in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Medium-term curative effect of extensively coated non-modular femoral stem in two-stage infection revision after joint replacement

Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy for Removal of Solidly-Fixed Femoral Implants in Total Hip Revision

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Patients with Osteoarthritis Secondary to Hip Pyogenic Infection.

Extensively Coated Non‐modular Stem Used in Two‐stage Revision for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mid‐term to Long‐term Follow‐up

[One-Stage Revision Operations for Infection after Hip Arthroplasty].

[Two-stage total hip arthroplasty using an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer for infected internal fixation of hip fractures]

One-Stage Arthroplasty or Revision for Seronegative Infections in Hip and Knee

Osteotomy in Artificial Femoral Component Revision with Severe Greater Trochanter Osteolysis

Treatment of Infection after Hip Arthroplasty by Spacer-Free Two-Stage Revision

Comparable Results of Single and Two-Stage Exchange for Select Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection

Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Does Not Compromise Functional and Radiographic Outcomes of Femoral Stem Revisions with the Use of an Uncemented Modular Conical Stem