A Novel LDLC Equation is Superior to the NIH LDLC Equation and the Friedewald Equation
Guo-Ming Zhang,Jing Liu,Xu-Xiao Guo,Fu-Meng Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s451743
IF: 2.145
2024-02-15
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Guo-Ming Zhang, 1, 2, &ast Jing Liu, 1, 2, &ast Xu-Xiao Guo, 3 Fu-Meng Yang 4 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shuyang Hospital, Shuyang, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Affiliated Shuyang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Shuyang, People's Republic of China; 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China; 4 Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, People's Republic of China &astThe authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Guo-Ming Zhang, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shuyang Hospital, No. 9, Yingbin Road, Shuyang, People's Republic of China, Email ; Background: LDLC equations have varying levels of underestimation for the calculated LDLC. Therefore, underestimating LDLC should be avoided as much as possible. We need to establish LDLC equations that underestimate LDLC as little as possible. Methods: We established the equations with a healthy cohort from Shuyang Hospital and validated the equations with an unselected patient cohort from The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang. We established the novel LDLC equations by using the regression equation. The relationship between two markers was analysed using Pearson's approach. The 95% limits of measuring agreement within ± 2 SD for the LDLC equations was performed using Bland‒Altman analysis. ROC curve analysis was used to predict LDLC levels and the accuracy of the LDLC equation for determining the direct LDLC levels at LDLC cut-offs was assessed. Results: We obtained two novel LDLC equations (LDL_nonHDLC equation=− 0.899+1.195&astnonHDLC-0.00347&astnonHDLC 2 and LDL_TC(total cholesterol) equation=− 2.775+1.29&astTC − 0.00990&ast TC 2 ). The correlation coefficient between the novel LDLC equation and the direct LDLC measurements is not lower than that between the LDL_NIH equation and the direct LDLC measurements. The AUCs of our novel LDLC equations were greater than those of the LDL_NIH equation and the LDL_F equation at the LDLC cut-offs for clinical decision-making. The measuring agreement in the methods of the LDL_nonHDL equation is superior to that of the LDL_NIH equation. Conclusion: LDLC calculated by the novel LDL_nonHDL equation exhibited superiority over the LDL_NIH equation. Combining the LDL_NIH equation and our novel LDLC equation may improve accuracy and avoid undertreatment of high LDLC levels. Keywords: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, NIH LDL-C equation, friedewald equation, novel LDLC equation A lipid panel that includes triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HDLC), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDLC) 1 is used worldwide for routine testing to determine your cholesterol status. Routinely, the LDLC level is estimated by calculation using a formula (eg, the NIH LDLC (LDL_NIH) equation 2 and the Friedewald (LDL_F) equation). 3 However, direct measurement of LDLC is not a routine cholesterol test. 4 Research indicates 5 that the direct measurement of LDLC is important for information about CVD risk. However, its advantages are modest when comparing it to LDLC levels calculated using a formula. Because the LDLC calculated formula is a reliable and cost-effective method for routine cholesterol tests, 6 the LDLC calculated formula still needs to be optimized and improved. We read with interest an article titled "Validating the LDL_NIH equation in a specialized lipid cohort: Does it add up?" by Victoria Higgins et al that was published in Clinical Biochemistry. 7 The authors focused on which calculation equation is better for LDLC and concluded that the LDL_NIH equation was superior to the LDL_F equation based on ultracentrifugation LDLC. Is this true? It can be seen from the cohort of equations we established that the LDLC calculated by the LDL_NIH and LDL_F equations is lower than that measured by the direct method (Table 1). Table 1 The Characteristics of Establishment of the LDLC Equation Group Hence, we established an LDLC equation for estimating LDLC levels using cohorts of healthy individuals base on the direct measurement of LDLC and compared the novel LDLC equations, the LDL_NIH equation, and the LDL_F equation for use in other unselected patient cohorts. We obtained a large cohort of data from routine check-ups of healthy individuals from the Shuyang Hospital laboratory information system for ret -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal