Abstract:Rationale: Although aligning care with patient goals is fundamental to critical care, this process is often delayed and leads to conflict among patients, families, and intensive care unit (ICU) teams. Interprofessional collaboration within ICU teams is an opportunity to improve goal-aligned care, yet this collaboration is poorly understood. A better understanding of how ICU team members work together to provide goal-aligned care may identify new strategies for improvement. Objectives: Transactive memory systems is a theory of group mind that explains how high-performing teams use a shared memory and collective cognition. We applied this theory to characterize the process of interprofessional collaboration within ICU teams and its relationship with goal-aligned care. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of focus group (n = 10) and semistructured interview (n = 8) transcripts, gathered during a parent study at two academic medical centers on the process of ICU care delivery in acute respiratory failure. Participants (N = 70) included interprofessional ICU and palliative care team members, surrogates, and patient survivors. We used directed content analysis, applying transactive memory systems theory and its major components (specialization, coordination, credibility) to examine ICU team collaboration. Results: Participants described each ICU profession as having a specialized role in aligning care with patient goals. Different professions have different opportunities to gather knowledge about patient goals and priorities, which results in dispersion of this knowledge among different team members. To share and use this dispersed knowledge, ICU teams rely on an informal coordination process and "side conversations." This process is a workaround for formal channels (e.g., health records, interprofessional rounds) that do not adequately convey knowledge about patient goals. This informal process does not occur if team members are discouraged from asserting their knowledge because of hierarchy or lack of psychological safety. Conversely, coordination succeeds when team members recognize each other as credible sources of valued knowledge. Conclusions: We found that ICU team members work together to align care with patient goals and priorities, using transactive memory systems. The successful function of these systems can be disrupted or promoted by ICU organizational and cultural factors, which are potential targets for efforts to increase goal-aligned care.

Social science and teams: a patient perspective

Multidisciplinary teams and social science: a patient perspective

Teamwork in Clinical Medicine

Exploring the use of social network methods in designing healthcare quality improvement teams

Shared decision‐making and social science: A patient perspective

Telemedicine and Teamwork Among Health Care Professionals: State of the Science

Patient-centered care in the OR: is this possible?

Teamwork matters: team situation awareness to build high-performing healthcare teams, a narrative review

Pulling together and pulling apart: influences of convergence and divergence on distributed healthcare teams

Overcoming Challenges to Teamwork in Healthcare: A Team Effectiveness Framework and Evidence-Based Guidance

Analyzing interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: An exploratory observational study using conventional and alternative approaches

Teamwork enhances patient experience: linking TEAM and Net Promoter Scores

The art and science of teamwork: Enacting a transdisciplinary approach in work rehabilitation

The basis of clinical tribalism, hierarchy and stereotyping: a laboratory-controlled teamwork experiment

Social and healthcare students' competence in patient-oriented care enhanced during interprofessional practice: A scoping review

Patients' perspectives on care, communication, and teamwork in the emergency department

Impact of Interprofessional Teamwork on Aligning Intensive Care Unit Care with Patient Goals: A Qualitative Study of Transactive Memory Systems

Benefits of Seeing Health Care as a Team Sport

[The care team, from roots to new challenges]

Medical teamwork and the evolution of safety science: a critical review

Are we at risk of groupthink in our approach to teamwork interventions in health care?