Towards Consistency in Dietary Pattern Scoring: Standardising Scoring Workflows for Mediterranean, DASH, and MIND Diets Using 24-Hour Recall and Two Variations of a Food Frequency Questionnaire

Lizanne Arnoldy,Sarah Gauci,Annie-Claude M. Lassemillante,Joris C. Verster,Helen Macpherson,Anne-Marie Minihane,Andrew Scholey,Andrew Pipingas,David J. White

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114524000072

2024-01-18

British Journal Of Nutrition

Abstract:Healthy dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet (MeDi), DASH and MIND have been evaluated for their potential association with health outcomes. However, the lack of standardisation in scoring methodologies can hinder reproducibility and meaningful cross-study comparisons. Here we provide a reproducible workflow for generating the MeDi, DASH, and MIND dietary pattern scores from frequently used dietary assessment tools including the 24-hour recall tool and two variations of food frequency questionnaires. Subjective aspects of the scoring process are highlighted and have led to a recommended reporting checklist. This checklist enables standardised reporting with sufficient detail to enhance the reproducibility and comparability of their outcomes. In addition to these aims, valuable insights in the strengths and limitations of each assessment tool for scoring the MeDi, DASH and MIND diet can be utilised by researchers and clinicians to determine which dietary assessment tool best meets their needs.

nutrition & dietetics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is that the current scoring methods for evaluating the Mediterranean diet (MeDi), DASH diet, and MIND diet patterns lack standardization, which has led to the non - reproducibility of research results and the difficulty in comparison across studies. Specifically:

1. **Inconsistency in scoring methods**: Different studies make subjective decisions in choosing dietary assessment tools, scoring methods, food items or coding, and determining the grams of each portion of food, etc. These decisions have led to great differences in methods in the literature and may affect the strength of association.

2. **Lack of detailed description**: Most studies have failed to fully describe the dietary pattern scoring methods used, making it difficult for other researchers to reproduce their results.

3. **Diversity of scoring systems**: For example, for the Mediterranean diet score, there are already more than 28 different scoring methods, and this diversity further hinders the synthesis of evidence and its translation into dietary guidelines or interventions.

To address these problems, this study proposes two main objectives:

- **Establish a standardized work flow**: Provide a reproducible work flow for generating MeDi, DASH, and MIND dietary pattern scores from commonly used dietary assessment tools (such as the 24 - hour recall method and two forms of food frequency questionnaires). This will help improve the comparability and reproducibility of research results, thereby better understanding the relationship between dietary patterns and health outcomes.

- **Recommend a best - practice reporting checklist**: Propose a "best - practice" reporting checklist, emphasizing the key elements that need to be described in detail in the dietary scoring work flow, in order to promote the reproducibility and comparability of research. These suggestions are of great value for researchers, editors, and reviewers to optimize scoring practices and reporting in the field of nutrition research.

By achieving these two objectives, this study aims to reduce bias and provide a more consistent and reliable methodological basis for future research.