Glycated Hemoglobin and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality among Adults with and Without Diabetes.

Fu-Rong Li,Xi-Ru Zhang,Wen-Fang Zhong,Zhi-Hao Li,Xiang Gao,Virginia Byers Kraus,Yue-Bin Lv,Meng-Chen Zou,Guo-Chong Chen,Pei-Liang Chen,Min-Yi Zhang,Akech Kuol Akech Kur,Xiao-Ming Shi,Xian-Bo Wu,Chen Mao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-02536
2019-01-01
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Abstract:CONTEXT The patterns of associations between glycated Hb (HbA1c) and mortality are still unclear. OBJECTIVE To explore the extent to which ranges of HbA1c levels are associated with the risk of mortality among participants with and without diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS This was a nationwide, community-based prospective cohort study. Included were 15,869 participants (median age 64 years) of the Health and Retirement Study, with available HbA1c data and without a history of cancer. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% CIs for mortality. RESULTS A total of 2133 participants died during a median follow-up of 5.8 years. In participants with diabetes, those with an HbA1c level of 6.5% were at the lowest risk of all-cause mortality. When HbA1c level was <5.6% or >7.4%, the increased all-cause mortality risk became statistically significant as compared with an HbA1c level of 6.5%. As for participants without diabetes, those with an HbA1c level of 5.4% were at the lowest risk of all-cause mortality. When the HbA1c level was <5.0%, the increased all-cause mortality risk became statistically significant as compared with an HbA1c level of 5.4%. However, we did not observe a statistically significant elevated risk of all-cause mortality above an HbA1c level of 5.4%. CONCLUSIONS A U-shaped and reverse J-shaped association for all-cause mortality was found among participants with and without diabetes. The corresponding optimal ranges for overall survival are predicted to be 5.6% and 7.4% and 5.0% and 6.5%, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?