Abstract:It is known that certain structures of the signal in addition to the standard notion of sparsity (called structured sparsity) can improve the sample complexity in several compressive sensing applications. Recently, Hegde et al. proposed a framework, called approximation-tolerant model-based compressive sensing, for recovering signals with structured sparsity. Their framework requires two oracles, the head- and the tail-approximation projection oracles. The two oracles should return approximate solutions in the model which is closest to the query signal. In this paper, we consider two structured sparsity models and obtain improved projection algorithms. The first one is the tree sparsity model, which captures the support structure in the wavelet decomposition of piecewise-smooth signals. We propose a linear time $(1-ε)$-approximation algorithm for head-approximation projection and a linear time $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm for tail-approximation projection. The best previous result is an $\tilde{O}(n\log n)$ time bicriterion approximation algorithm (meaning that their algorithm may return a solution of sparsity larger than $k$) by Hegde et al. Our result provides an affirmative answer to the open problem mentioned in the survey of Hegde and Indyk. As a corollary, we can recover a constant approximate $k$-sparse signal. The other is the Constrained Earth Mover Distance (CEMD) model, which is useful to model the situation where the positions of the nonzero coefficients of a signal do not change significantly as a function of spatial (or temporal) locations. We obtain the first single criterion constant factor approximation algorithm for the head-approximation projection. The previous best known algorithm is a bicriterion approximation. Using this result, we can get a faster constant approximation algorithm with fewer measurements for the recovery problem in CEMD model.

Efficient Recovery of Structured Sparse Signals Via Approximate Message Passing with Structured Spike and Slab Prior

Approximate Message Passing with Nearest Neighbor Sparsity Pattern Learning

Block-Sparse Signal Recovery Based on Adaptive Matching Pursuit Via Spike and Slab Prior

Robust Recovery of Structured Sparse Signals with Uncertain Sensing Matrix: A Turbo-VBI Approach.

Adaptive One-Bit Quantisation Via Approximate Message Passing with Nearest Neighbour Sparsity Pattern Learning

Sparse Bayesian Learning Approach for Discrete Signal Reconstruction

Bayesian Optimal Approximate Message Passing to Recover Structured Sparse Signals

Approximate Message Passing for Sparse Recovering of Spatially and Temporally Correlated Data

Variance State Propagation for Structured Sparse Bayesian Learning

A Variational Bayesian EM Approach to Structured Sparse Signal Reconstruction

Sparse Vector Recovery: Bernoulli-Gaussian Message Passing

Structured Bayesian Learning for Recovery of Clustered Sparse Signal.

Recovery of Structured Signals with Prior Information Via Maximizing Correlation.

Two-Dimensional Pattern-Coupled Sparse Bayesian Learning Via Generalized Approximate Message Passing.

Expectation Maximisation-Based Approach to Recovering Multiple Sparse Signals with Common Sparsity Pattern

Group Adaptive Matching Pursuit with Intra-Group Correlation Learning for Sparse Signal Recovery

Vector Approximate Message Passing with Sparse Bayesian Learning for Gaussian Mixture Prior

Computationally Efficient Sparse Bayesian Learning Via Generalized Approximate Message Passing

Improved Algorithms for Structured Sparse Recovery

Simultaneous Block-Sparse Signal Recovery Using Pattern-Coupled Sparse Bayesian Learning

Adaptive matching pursuit for sparse signal recovery