The Important Role of Preoperative D-Dimer in Constrictive Pericarditis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s462075
2024-05-06
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Abstract:Likui Fang, Fangming Zhong, Wenfeng Yu, Pengfei Zhu, Guocan Yu Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Likui Fang, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China, Email Background: The impact of coagulation indicators on postoperative outcomes of patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing pericardiectomy has been poorly investigated. This study aimed to assess the prognostic role of preoperative coagulation indicators in these patients. Methods: We retrospectively included 158 patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing pericardiectomy. The diagnostic values of coagulation indicators for postoperative complications were evaluated by ROC curves. Patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff value calculated by ROC curve. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors of postoperative complications. Results: ROC curve showed that among different coagulation indicators, preoperative D-dimer (DD) level could effectively identify patients with postoperative complications (AUC 0.771, 95% CI 0.696– 0.847, P < 0.001). Patients were divided into the low DD group and the high DD group. The comparison of postoperative outcomes suggested that high preoperative DD level was significantly associated with longer durations of vasoactive agents using (P = 0.018), intubation (P = 0.020), ICU stay (P = 0.008), chest drainage (P=0.004) and hospital stay (P = 0.002). Multivariable analysis showed that high preoperative DD level was the independent risk factor of postoperative complications (OR 6.892, 95% CI 2.604– 18.235, P < 0.001). Conclusion: High preoperative DD level was significantly linked to poor postoperative outcomes and could provide an effective prediction ability for postoperative complications in patients with constrictive pericarditis. Keywords: constrictive pericarditis, D-dimer, postoperative complications, outcomes Constrictive pericarditis is a rare and severe disease caused by thickened and inelastic pericardium. 1 The etiology of constrictive pericarditis is various including idiopathic, viral, prior cardiac surgery, history of radiotherapy, malignancy and trauma, whereas the most common cause remains to be tuberculosis, especially in developing countries. 2–4 The prognosis for constrictive pericarditis is poor, and in most cases conservative treatment only provides temporary relief of symptoms. 5 Pericardiectomy is a definitive treatment option, but surgical resection of pericardium carries a high risk of postoperative mortality with reported rate up to 17.6%. 6–9 Given the difficulty of predicting precise prognosis in constrictive pericarditis, some easily accessible indicators, such as laboratory indicators, should be considered as predictors for a more accurate prognosis evaluation. Coagulation indicators are frequently screened preoperatively and taken into account during perioperative planning. Abnormal coagulation profiles could result in adverse postoperative outcomes. 10,11 Among coagulation indicators, D-dimer has received growing attention especially and is commonly associated with various clinical settings such as inflammation, pneumonia, cancer, septicemia and surgery. 12 Nevertheless, it is unclear about the effect of coagulation on postoperative outcomes of constrictive pericarditis. This study aimed to assess whether preoperative coagulation indicators had an impact on postoperative outcomes in constrictive pericarditis, thereby helping surgeons to screen out high-risk patients for early intervention. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital (No. 2023140), and considering the nature of the retrospective study, written patient informed consent was waived. A total of 158 patients with clinically diagnosed constrictive pericarditis who underwent radical pericardiectomy at Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital between November 2012 and October 2023 were enrolled in this study. Patients with incomplete coagulation test results were not eligible. The diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis was primarily based on clinical symptom, cardiac imaging and central venous pressure (CVP). 13 Cardiac imaging examinations mainly included echocardiography and chest enhanced computed tomography. Cardiac magnetic resonance was also performed to confirm the diagnosis in some cases. The etiology of constrictive pericarditis was evaluated by pathologic examination and pathogen detection on resected pericardial tissue. All the information was obtained from the -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services