A Genomic And Clinicopathological Study Of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers With Discordant Ros1 Gene Status By Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridisation And Immunohistochemical Analysis

Jing Zhao,Xiaotong Chen,Jing Zheng,Mei Kong,Bo Wang,Wei Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13492
2018-01-01
Histopathology
Abstract:AimsROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using D4D6 antibody is a useful tool for screening patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who may be suitable for targeted therapy. Many studies and our data have identified cases that express the ROS1 protein strongly but are negative for ROS1 by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH). The present study investigated the driver mutation and clinicopathological characteristics of 26 discordant cases (ROS1 IHC-positive but FISH-negative) to find new clues for distinguishing real ROS1-rearranged cases.Methods and resultsTumours from 26 discordant cases were analysed for clinicopathological characteristics, mutations in EGFR, KRAS, ERBB2, BRAF and PIK3CA; fusions in ALK and RET; and amplifications in MET, ERBB2 and ROS1. ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs were significantly more likely to be found in younger patients and at an advanced stage; they showed cribriform features, extracellular mucus and psammoma bodies, whereas ROS1-discordant cases were found in older patients at a relatively early tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and showed a lepidic growth pattern (all P < 0.001). Most ROS1-rearranged NSCLCs had no concurrent mutation, whereas 73% of discordant cases harboured genetic aberrations, including EGFR and ERBB2. Compared with general lung adenocarcinomas, ERBB-2 abnormality was disproportionately high in ROS1-discordant cases. Moreover, we optimised the scoring criteria for ROS1 IHC as H score > 150 and no concurrent mutations'; the specificity was then increased to 81.6%.ConclusionsCompared with ROS1-rearranged cases, ROS1-discordant patients showed distinct clinical and morphological features and often harboured another oncogenic driver alteration. The use of optimised screening criteria will increase the specificity of ROS1 antibody.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?