4-plex quantitative glycoproteomics using glycan/protein-stable isotope labeling in cell culture
Peilin Jiang,Md Abdul Hakim,Arvin Saffarian Delkhosh,Parisa Ahmadi,Yunxiang Li,Yehia Mechref
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2024.105333
2024-10-17
Abstract:Alterations in glycoprotein abundance and glycan structures are closely linked to numerous diseases. The quantitative exploration of glycoproteomics is pivotal for biomarker discovery, but comprehensive analysis within biological samples remains challenging due to low abundance, complexity, and lack of universal technology. We developed a multiplex glycoproteomic approach using an LC-ESI-MS platform for direct comparison of glycoproteomic quantitation. Glycopeptides were isotopically labeled during cell culture, achieving high labeling efficiency (≥ 95 %) for both glycans and peptides. Quantitation was validated by mixing the same cell line in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, with mathematical correction applied to deconvolute the ratios. This method proved reliable and was applied to a comparative glycoproteomic study of three breast cancer cell lines (HTB22, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-231BR) and one brain cancer cell line (CRL-1620), quantifying glycopeptides from three replicates. The expression of glycopeptides was relatively quantified, and up/down-regulation between cell lines was investigated. This approach provided insights into glycosylation microheterogeneity, crucial for breast cancer brain metastasis research. Benefits include eliminating fluctuations from nano electrospray ionization and reducing analysis time, enabling up to 4-plex profiling in a single injection. Metabolic labeling introduced mass differences at the MS1 level, ensuring increased sensitivity and higher resolution for accurate quantitation. SIGNIFICANCE: Alternations in glycoprotein abundance, changes in glycosylation levels, and variations in glycan structures are closely linked to numerous diseases. The quantitative exploration of glycoproteomics has emerged as a popular area of research for biomarker discovery. However, conducting a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the glycoproteome within biological samples remains challenging due to low abundance, inherent complexities, and the absence of universal quantitative technology. Here, we developed a multiplex glycoproteomic approach using an LC-ESI-MS platform to facilitate direct comparison of glycoproteomic quantitation and enhance throughput. This approach offers benefits such as eliminating quantitative fluctuations arising from nano electrospray ionization (ESI) and reducing analysis time, enabling up to 4-plex glycoproteomic profiling in a single injection. Glycopeptides were stable isotopic labeled during cell culture procedure, attaching to monosaccharides, amino acids, or both. We achieved a high labeling efficiency (≥ 95 %) for both glycans and peptides. Quantitation validation was tested on glycopeptides by mixing the same cell line with 1:1:1:1 ratio. Due to the overlapped isotopes, a mathematical correction was applied to deconvolute the ratio of 4-plex glycopeptides. This method demonstrated quantitative reliability and was successfully applied to a comparative glycoproteomic study of three breast cancer cells (HTB22, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-231BR) and one brain cancer cell (CRL-1620), identifying a total of 264 glycopeptides from three replicates. The expression of glycopeptides among these four cells was relatively quantified and up/down-regulation between two cell lines was investigated. The exploration of glycosylation microheterogeneity through glycopeptide quantification may offer valuable insights for further investigation into breast cancer brain metastasis. Conclusion: The primary advantage of our presented work lies in the multiplexing offered by combining two established labeling techniques, SILAC and IDAWG, both of which have been effectively used and widely cited in the scientific community. This combination enhances the applicability and accuracy of our method, as demonstrated by the extensive citations and successful use of these techniques independently. We believe that this multiplexing approach significantly advances the field, despite the method's current limitation to cell systems.