Experimental Study of Microbubble CO 2 Flooding in Heterogeneous Sedimentary Rock
Hyuck Park,Lanlan Jiang,Tamotsu Kiyama,Ziqiu Xue
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3365701
2018-01-01
Abstract:The injectivity and solubility of CO2 are important characteristics for CO2 geological sequestration especially in heterogeneous underground. We have been conducting laboratory experiments of CO2 flooding for core scale specimen. In recent years, we are paying attention to the possibilities of microbubble CO2 flooding. In this study, microbubble CO2 flooding and conventional CO2 flooding are compared through experiment results. One core specimen (Sarukawa sandstone, diameter: 34.80mm, length: 79.85mm, from Japan) was used for both cases. Porosity of the specimen determined by X-ray CT (Computed Tomography) imaging is 31.2%. It has a heterogeneous structure, especially, upper part of specimen is more complex than the lower part. For the CO2 microbubble generation, custom made micro porous filter was applied. Its size is 34.80mm in diameter and 4mm in thickness. The behaviors of CO2 microbubbles were recorded by X-ray CT system. Our experimental system enables simultaneous flow testing and CT scanning. We could estimate the porosity of dry specimen and visualize the process of water injection, oil injection and CO2 flooding by the X-ray CT image analysis. CO2 saturation during the tests were also evaluated. The experiments were carried out under the pressure and temperature conditions that simulate underground environments; pore pressure: 10MPa, system temperature: 40 degrees Celsius. The confining pressure of 12MPa was selected in this study. The specimen was saturated with KI aqueous solution (Potassium Iodide, 11.5wt%), and then oil (1,10-Diiododecane, 12.6wt%) was injected to change the specimen into oil-water mixed condition. For the CO2 flooding, three kinds of flow rates (-0.1, -1.0, -1.5 ml/min) for downstream syringe pump were selected. By performing this operation, we could increase differential pressure after 1.0PV (pore volume) and 1.7PV CO2 flooding to confirm the influence of differential pressure on CO2 saturation and fluid recovery. Totally, ten steps of CO2 flooding were performed for both cases. For each step, KI aqueous solution and oil were carefully recovered from the downstream syringe pump which plays a role of back pressure. The CO2 flooding tests were carried out until the CO2 flooding reach about 3PV. Figures show the differential CT images at breakthrough (a: microbubble case, b: conventional method case) and when the CO2 flooding reach about 2PV (c: microbubble case, d: conventional method case). Looking at the top of the specimen, the microbubble case shows higher CO2 saturation than the conventional method case (c, d). According to the experiment results, the CO2 saturations obtained from CT image analysis agree well in harmony with the total fluid recoveries which measured from the recovered amounts of KI aqueous solution and oil. The CO2 saturations of both cases did not show significant difference up to 1 PV CO2 flooding, but the difference was caused by the differential pressure change and maintained a constant difference from 1.5 PV. On the other hand, the oil recoveries of both cases started to show a difference from before the differential pressure change and gradually increased, and maintained a constant difference from 1.5PV. As a result, in the