The Heterogeneity Between Lynch-Associated and Sporadic MMR Deficiency in Colorectal Cancers.

Guo-Chen Liu,Ran-Yi Liu,Jun-Ping Yan,Xin An,Wu Jiang,Yi-Hong Ling,Jie-Wei Chen,Jin-Xin Bei,Xiao-Yu Zuo,Mu-Yan Cai,Ze-Xian Liu,Zhi-Xiang Zuo,Ji-Hong Liu,Zhi-Zhong Pan,Pei-Rong Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy004
2018-01-01
Abstract:Background: Previous studies demonstrated that prognosis of germline deficiency in mismatch repair protein (dMMR) was different from that of sporadic dMMR. The underlying mechanism has not been studied. Methods: From a prospectively maintained database, we collected dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) patients identified by postoperative immunohistochemistry screening. According to genetic test, patients were grouped as Lynch-associated or sporadic dMMR. We compared the clinical-pathological features, prognosis, and immunoreactive differences between the two groups. By whole-exome sequencing and neoantigen detection pipeline, mutational frequencies and neoantigen burdens were also compared. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Sixty-seven sporadic dMMR and 85 Lynch-associated CRC patients were included in the study. Sporadic dMMR patients were older (P < .001) and their tumors were poorly differentiated (P - .03). The survival was better in the Lynch-associated group (P - .001). After adjustment, the difference still remained statistically significant (hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval = 0.09 to 0.95, P = .04). The scores of Crohn's-like reaction (CRO; P < .001), immunoreactions in the invasive margin (IM; P = .01), tumor stroma (TS; P = .009), and cancer nest (CN; P = .02) of the Lynch-associated group were statistically significantly higher. The numbers of CD3+, CD8 t , Poxp31 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in IM; CD3 , CD41 TILs in TS; and CD31 , CD4 t , CD81 TILs in CN were statistically significantly higher in Lynch-associated dMMR patients. Based on the 16 patients who under went whole-exome sequencing, there were also more somatic mutations and neoantigen burdens in the Lynch-associated group compared with the sporadic dMMR group (439/pt vs 68/pt, P = .006; 628/pt vs 97/pt, P = .009). Conclusions: There are heterogeneities in dMMR CRCs. Lynch-associated dMMR patients present with more somatic mutations and neoantigens compared with sporadic dMMR, which probably results in stronger immunoreactions and survival improvement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?