Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial Of The Effects Of Free Glasses On Glasses Purchase In China: The Price (Potentiating Rural Investment In Children'S Eyecare) Study

Nathan G Congdon,Xiuqin Wang,Yue Ma,Weiqi Liao,Baixiang Xiao,Ming Ni,Yiwen Huang,Hongmei Yi,Xiaochen Ma,Scott Rozelle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187808
IF: 3.7
2016-01-01
PLoS ONE
Abstract:BackgroundOffering free glasses can be important to increase children's wear. We sought to assess whether "Upgrade glasses" could avoid reduced glasses sales when offering free glasses to children in China.MethodsIn this cluster-randomized, controlled trial, children with uncorrected visual acuity (VA)< = 6/12 in either eye correctable to >6/12 in both eyes at 138 randomly-selected primary schools in 9 counties in Guangdong and Yunnan provinces, China, were randomized by school to one of four groups: glasses prescription only (Control); Free Glasses; Free Glasses + offer of $15 Upgrade Glasses; Free Glasses + offer of $30 Upgrade Glasses. Spectacle purchase (main outcome) was assessed 6 months after randomization.ResultsAmong 10,234 children screened, 882 (8.62%, mean age 10.6 years, 45.5% boys) were eligible and randomized: 257 (29.1%) at 37 schools to Control; 253 (28.7%) at 32 schools to Free Glasses; 187 (21.2%) at 31 schools to Free Glasses + $15 Upgrade; and 185 (21.0%) at 27 schools to Free Glasses +$30 Upgrade. Baseline ownership among these children needing glasses was 11.8% (104/882), and 867 (98.3%) children completed follow-up. Glasses purchase was significantly less likely when free glasses were given: Control: 59/250 = 23.6%; Free glasses: 32/252 = 12.7%, P = 0.010. Offering Upgrade Glasses eliminated this difference: Free + $15 Upgrade: 39/183 = 21.3%, multiple regression relative risk (RR) 0.90 (0.56-1.43), P = 0.65; Free + $30 Upgrade: 38/182 = 20.9%, RR 0.91 (0.59, 1.42), P = 0.69.ConclusionsUpgrade glasses can prevent reductions in glasses purchase when free spectacles are provided, providing important program income.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?