PO-0679: Role of Chemoradiation Therapy As an Initial Treatment for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

M. Ma,X. S. Gao,X. Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(17)31116-7
IF: 6.901
2017-01-01
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:ESTRO 36 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 11]. This checklist consists of minimum criteria that cancer clinical trials should incorporate to provide reliable HRQoL outcomes.The 11 items are categorized into conceptual, measurement, methodology and interpretation domains.All included studies were scored for adherence to the checklist.Each item that met the criteria received 1 point with a maximum of 11 points.Outcomes range from 'probably robust ' (8 -11) to 'very limited' (0 -4). ResultsFrom 2005-2015, out of 225 publications reviewed, 16 LA-NSCLC clinical trials (represented in 25 articles) incorporated HRQoL endpoints.Radiotherapy was evaluated, in combination with surgery, systemic therapy or with medication aiming to reduce adverse radiotherapy effects, and impact on HRQoL was assessed.None of the studies had a methodological quality below 4 ('very limited').The average quality score of HRQoL reporting in all studies was 7.875, with 13 studies considered to be of high quality ('probably robust'), versus 3 studies of average quality ('limited robust').No studies fulfilled all criteria.Particularly, details on a priori hypothesis (n=16) and details on missing data (n=9) were missing.Additionally, clinical significance rather than simple statistical significance was often unaddressed (n=13). ConclusionQualitative reporting of HRQoL outcomes in scientific articles is a crucial aspect to adequately interpret HRQoL results, with the aim to facilitate daily clinical decision making and support therapy policies.In this review, only the minority of clinical trials fulfilled the minimum criteria for adequate HRQoL reporting.Due to the limited methodological quality and especially the fact that certain crucial aspects of HRQoL data reporting are lacking in the studies, good interpretation of HRQoL data remains difficult.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?