Abstract:The goal of multi-view clustering is to partition samples into different subsets according to their diverse features. Previous multi-view clustering methods mainly exist two forms: multi-view spectral clustering and multi-view matrix factorization. Although they have shown excellent performance in many occasions, there are still many disadvantages. For example, multi-view spectral clustering usually needs to perform postprocessing. Multi-view matrix factorization directly decomposes the original data features. When the size of features is large, it encounters the expensive time consumption to decompose these data features thoroughly. Therefore, we proposed a novel multi-view clustering approach. The main advantages include the following three aspects: 1) it searches for a common joint graph across multiple views, which fully explores the hidden structure information by utilizing the compatibility among views; 2) the introduced nonnegative constraint manipulates that the final clustering results can be directly obtained; and 3) straightforwardly decomposing the similarity matrix can transform the eigenvalue factorization in spectral clustering with computational complexity O(n3) into the singular value decomposition (SVD) with O(nc2) time cost, where n and c , respectively, denote the numbers of samples and classes. Thus, the computational efficiency can be improved. Moreover, in order to learn a better clustering model, we set that the constructed similarity graph approximates each view affinity graph as close as possible by adding the constraint as the initial affinity matrices own. Furthermore, substantial experiments are conducted, which verifies the superiority of the proposed two clustering methods comparing with single-view clustering approaches and state-of-the-art multi-view clustering methods.

Multi‐view Spectral Clustering Via Partial Sum Minimisation of Singular Values

Multi-View Clustering Via Simultaneously Learning Shared Subspace And Affinity Matrix

Multiview Spectral Clustering Via Robust Subspace Segmentation

Multiview Spectral Clustering with Bipartite Graph

Robust Multi-View Spectral Clustering Via Low-Rank and Sparse Decomposition

Low-rank discrete multi-view spectral clustering

Multi-view Spectral Clustering Via Sparse Graph Learning

Joint Learning of Latent Similarity and Local Embedding for Multi-View Clustering

Partial Multi-View Spectral Clustering

Iterative Views Agreement: an Iterative Low-Rank Based Structured Optimization Method to Multi-View Spectral Clustering

Multi-View Clustering Via Nonnegative and Orthogonal Graph Reconstruction.

Low-rank tensor constrained co-regularized multi-view spectral clustering

Multi-view spectral clustering based on constrained Laplacian rank

Self-Weighting and Hypergraph Regularization for Multi-view Spectral Clustering

One-step Multi-View Spectral Clustering by Learning Common and Specific Nonnegative Embeddings

Multi-view spectral clustering via common structure maximization of local and global representations

Multi-view Clustering by Joint Spectral Embedding and Spectral Rotation

Multi-View Spectral Clustering with High-Order Optimal Neighborhood Laplacian Matrix

Incomplete multi-view clustering by simultaneously learning robust representations and optimal graph structures

Multi-View Spectral Clustering Via Integrating Global and Local Graphs.

Multi-view Spectral Clustering Via Robust Local Subspace Learning.