Effects Of Stochastic Simulations On Multiobjective Optimization Of Groundwater Remediation Design Under Uncertainty

Yun Yang,Jianfeng Wu,Qiankun Luo,Tao Zhang,Jichun Wu,Jinguo Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001510
IF: 2.4
2017-01-01
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Abstract:The first step in probabilistic multiobjective groundwater optimization is the conceptualization of the uncertain conductivity (K) field. The K distribution can be considered as a lognormal random variable. Two geostatistical approaches for conditional field generation, sequential Gaussian simulation (SGSIM) and sequential indicator simulation (SISIM), are used to generate sets of multiple conditional realizations of the K field. The SGSIM-and SISIM-generated K fields are found to have similar statistical properties, but SGSIM results in a smoother K field. The solutions to a probabilistic multiobjective optimization of groundwater remediation design case study are addressed by combining the probabilistic improved niched Pareto genetic algorithm (PINPGA) with the stochastic groundwater flow and transport model. The multiobjective optimization of groundwater remediation design for the removal of trichloroethylene (TCE) plume at Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR) in Cape Cod is used as a test case. The impact of the sets of lnK realizations are evaluated by comparing the first and second moments of the resulting three-dimensional (3D) contaminant plume and by comparing the resulting Pareto frontiers. The resulting contaminant plumes of the two techniques have similar centroids, but the standard deviation and maximum concentrations are higher with the SISIM conductivity fields. Although PINPGA is able to identify valuable Pareto-optimal strategies about uncertain remediation options given either approach to generating K-fields, the choice of conductivity field model impacted the Pareto frontiers. The optimization results demonstrate that with the smoothed SGSIM-based lnK realizations, the PINPGA methodology obtains a smaller range between the upper and lower confidence intervals of the Pareto frontiers. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?