Three-Year Survival in Stage Iv Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (nsclc): the Importance of Metastatic Distribution

Daniel D. Karp,Jan M. Hanneken,Sarah H. Taylor,Taoyan Men,Xifeng Wu,Xia Pu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojts.2013.32009
IF: 45.3
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:7608 Background: Although long term survival (LTS) is an important goal of lung cancer treatment, those with metastatic disease at presentation have a median of only 8-9 months in most series with a small “tail” on the survival curve. We analyzed a large cohort of Stage IV pts by performance status (PS), smoking history, number and sites of disease to assess factors associated with 36 month survival. Methods: From 2004–2008, 526 newly diagnosed untreated pts with Stage IV NSCLC received initial treatment at our institution. Sites of disease were analyzed according to lung, brain, bone, liver, adrenal, skin, malignant effusion, lymphangitic, bulky pleural disease, and “other”. No patient had definitive surgery. Results: Overall, 58/526 pts (10.8%) survived 36 months or more. 453 pts died within 36 months. 15 pts alive with follow-up time less than 36 months were removed from further analysis. Of those, 38/58 (65.5%) had only 1 metastatic site (p<0.001). 14 (24.1%) had 2 sites, only 6 (10.3%) had 3 or more sites. Those 19 pts with lung to lung spread were the most common (32.8%) with LTS – reflecting the M1 status in the new International Staging System. Only 1 LTS pt had liver mets at diagnosis – a solitary lesion treated with radiofrequency ablation. 20 pts had PS=0 (0.019) and 29 had PS=1 (NS). PS=2 pts made up 6. 2 pts had PS=3 initially. 1 unknown. Only 6/58 (10.3%) were current smokers, 23 (39.7%) were never-smokers (p<0.001). Adenocarcinoma made up 65.5%. Conclusions: Progress in lung cancer survival has been slow. Very few LTS pts have more than 1 site of metastatic disease at presentation, virtually none with liver disease (p=0.02). Number of metastatic sites and presence of liver metastases appear to be important stratification variables for lung cancer clinical trials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?