DDIS-02. AN ENGINEERED IN VITRO SYNTHESIZED PROTEIN ZR30 EXPRESSES ITS ANTI-CANCER EFFECT IN THE EXTRACELLULAR COMPARTMENT OF DIFFERENT GLIOMA CELL SUBPOPULATIONS IN INTRACRANIAL XENOGRAFT MODELS

Yanyan Li,Chuaniin Liu,Qingyue Wang,Xiaoxiao Han,Yong Han,Xiong-Hui Chen,Eric Siegel,Kambiz Afrasiabi,Mark Linskey,You-Xin Zhou,Yi-Hong Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now212.193
2016-01-01
Neuro-Oncology
Abstract:Therapeutants for successful cancer treatment should be designed to inhibit the growth and invasive features of the cancer cell as well as the cues of the tumor microenvironment. We have reported that glioma cells transduced with a construct to express an EFEMP1-derived tumor suppressor protein (ETSP) possesses these therapeutic effects with multiple tumor growth suppression mechanisms of action (MOA), including targeting EGFR/AKT-mediated cell growth, MMP2-mediated cell invasion and angiogenesis, and NOTCH-mediated cancer cell stemness. It appears that these anti-cancer effects originate in the extracellular compartment. Hence an in vitro synthesized protein, ZR30, based on the sequence of ETSP, with removal of the signal peptide was studied for its effect on these oncogenic proteins and its therapeutic potential. The results showed a positive effect of ZR30 in suppressing extracellular activation of MMP2 in multiple glioma cell lines. Two glioma cell subpopulations with high proliferative and angiogenic features, namely tumor mass-forming cells (TMC) and highly invasive stem-like tumor initiating cells (STIC) that were differentially enriched in the U251 and U251NS cell lines, respectively, were effectively targeted by 2 or 3-day exposure to ZR30 in culture, as evidenced by their decreased expression of EGFR, NOTCH, and their reduced AKT activities. Consistently, the growth of both glioma cell lines in an orthotopic environment was equally suppressed by ZR30 given at the stage of late tumor formation. The therapeutic potential of ZR30 was validated by markedly increased survival of mice harboring U251 xenografts, following only one intra-tumoral dose, at the time of early tumor formation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?