P3‐387: SURFACE‐BASED HIPPOCAMPAL MORPHOMETRY ANALYSIS FOR STUDYING EFFECTS OF APOE‐E4 ALLELE LOAD IN COGNITIVELY UNIMPAIRED SUBJECTS
Qunxi Dong,Wen Zhang,Jianfeng Wu,Bolun Li,Emily H. Schron,Travis McMahon,Jie Shi,Boris A. Gutman,Kewei Chen,Leslie C. Baxter,Paul M. Thompson,Eric M. Reiman,Richard J. Caselli,Yalin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.3420
2019-01-01
Abstract:Apolipoprotein E (APOE) e4 is the major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and it has been shown to be less efficient in clearing extracellular fibrillary amyloid β (Aβ) plaques, which would accelerate brain deformations from the hippocampus and medial temporal regions to the rest cortical regions (Liu et al., 2013; Cacciaglia et al., 2018). So it is valuable and necessary to reveal and intervene the hippocampal degenerations related to APOE-e4 before the onset of AD. The dose-dependent impact of APOE-e4 on hippocampal volumes has been documented, but its influence on general hippocampal morphology in cognitively unimpaired individuals is still elusive. To decode the exactly deformative hippocampal subregions, this work proposed to apply a novel surface-based hippocampal morphometry framework to study the APOE-e4 dose effects on a cognitively unimpaired cohort. The proposed automated framework includes hippocampal surface segmentation and reconstruction (Patenaude et al., 2011), higher-order hippocampal surface correspondence computation (Leporé et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2011), and hippocampal surface deformation analysis with multivariate statistics (see Figure 1) (Wang et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2018). This pipeline was conducted on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) database of 117 cognitively unimpaired subjects aged between 50 to 85 years (mean=57.4, SD=6.3), including 36 heterozygotes (HT: e3/e4), 37 homozygotes (HM: e4/e4) and 44 non-carriers (NC: e3/e3). Table 1 shows the demographic information of subjects. In our experiments, we analyzed hippocampal morphometry differences of the group contrasts of HM vs. NC, HT vs NC, and HM vs. HT. Their corresponding effect sizes were estimated using the cumulative distribution functions (CDF) (Shi et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013). As shown in Figure 2, our hippocampal morphometry statistics showed greater statistical power by distinguishing cognitively unimpaired subjects with two, one, and no APOE-e4 alleles.