Effect of Low-Dose Cytarabine and Aclarubicin in Combination with Decitabine and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Priming on the Outcome of Patients with Myeloid Neoplasms

SiXuan Qian,Peng Liu,Jianyong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v118.21.5047.5047
IF: 20.3
2011-01-01
Blood
Abstract:Abstract 5047 Purpose Patients older than 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase (CML-BC) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have non-intensive treatment options because of the lack of effectiveness and the toxicity of available therapies. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of the low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with hypomethylating agent decitabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming as induction therapy in MDS, CML-BC and older patients with AML. Patients and Methods We described 28 consecutive patients (median age 65.5 years, range 49–78 years with MDS (n= 7) or AML (n= 17), or CML-BC (n=4). Among them, Seventeen were cases of AML (10 previously untreated AML, 3 bone marrow relapse, 2 extramedullary relapse and 1 MDS-AML); 4 were cases of CML-BC who were resistant to imatinib or nilotinib therapy and 7 were cases of MDS. Cytogenetic analysis was performed in all the patients, showing 7 patients had cytogenetic aberrations. All patients were treated with decitabine 15 mg/m2 intravenously for 5 consecutive days (d1-5) in combination with cytarabine 10 mg/m2 q12h for 7 days (d3-9) and aclarubicin 10mg every day for 4 days (d3-6) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 300μg every day (d 0–9) priming (D-CAG). G-CSF was withdrawn when the white blood cell count (WBC) >20×109/L. Hydroxyurea or in combination with homoharringtonine 1mg/d intravenously was treated until WBC was Results Fifteen older patients with AML (median 68 years, range 60–78 years) were enrolled. Among those patients, 10 were in previously untreated AML, 3 bone marrow relapse, 1 extramedullary relapse and 1 secondary AML. The overall response rate (ORR) was 86.7% (13/15) in all older patients, 80.0% (8/10) in patients with previously untreated AML, and the complete rate (CR) was 73.3% after one cycle. 3 older patients with bone marrow relapse achieved. Two patients with extramedullary relapse achieved partial remission (PR) after one cycle. Two fourth of patients with high WBC more than 100×109/L at the time of diagnosis achieved CR. 7 patients with MDS (6 high-risk MDS, 1 RCMD) achieved the therapy. 3/5 patients achieved the CR or 2/5 PR. Other 2 high-risk MDS patients with refractory to convenient regimens such as CAG and HA had non-response to D-CAG regimen. All of the CML-BC patients received the one cycle of D-CAG regimen. Three fourth CML-BC patients achieved the CR and one stopped disease progression. All patients completed the treatment and there was no induction mortality. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was universal. Median duration of granulocyte recovery (0.5×109/L) was 13 days(4–20), and that of platelet recovery (×109/L) was 10 days(2–16).The platelets rose above 600×109/L in 5 patients and all counts returned to the normal range with a week and there were no thrombotic complications including one patient with atrial fibrillation. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression, febrile neutropenia. Conclusion D-CAG regimen as the induction therapy seemed to be a safe and effective regimen for patients with untreated/relapsed AML, MDS and CML-BC, including older patients, and it has well tolerance. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?