A Fractional Motion Diffusion Model for Grading Pediatric Brain Tumors

M. Muge Karaman,He Wang,Yi Sui,Herbert H. Engelhard,Yuhua Li,Xiaohong Joe Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.10.003

IF: 4.891

2016-01-01

NeuroImage Clinical

Abstract:Objectives: To demonstrate the feasibility of a novel fractional motion (FM) diffusion model for distinguishing low-versus high-grade pediatric brain tumors; and to investigate its possible advantage over apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and/or a previously reported continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) diffusion model.Materials and methods: With approval from the institutional review board and written informed consents from the legal guardians of all participating patients, this study involved 70 children with histopathologically-proven brain tumors (30 low-grade and 40 high-grade). Multi-b-value diffusion images were acquired and analyzed using the FM, CTRW, and mono-exponential diffusion models. The FM parameters, D-fm, phi, psi (non-Gaussian diffusion statistical measures), and the CTRW parameters, D-m, alpha, beta (non-Gaussian temporal and spatial diffusion heterogeneity measures) were compared between the low-and high-grade tumor groups by using a Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon U test. The performance of the FM model for differentiating between low- and high-grade tumors was evaluated and compared with that of the CTRW and themono-exponential models using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.Results: The FM parameters were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in the high-grade (D-fm: 0.81 +/- 0.26, phi: 1.40 +/- 0.10, psi: 0.42 +/- 0.11) than in the low-grade (D-fm: 1.52 +/- 0.52, phi: 1.64 +/- 0.13, psi: 0.67 +/- 0.13) tumor groups. The ROC analysis showed that the FM parameters offered better specificity (88% versus 73%), sensitivity (90% versus 82%), accuracy (88% versus 78%), and area under the curve (AUC, 93% versus 80%) in discriminating tumor malignancy compared to the conventional ADC. The performance of the FM model was similar to that of the CTRW model.Conclusions: Similar to the CTRW model, the FM model can improve differentiation between low- and high-grade pediatric brain tumors over ADC. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.