Abstract:Body size is interesting to (paleo)biologists owing to its association with a large number of ecological, developmental, and functional constraints. Investigations of size-related phenomena are arguably of more importance to micropaleontologists because of the wide range of sizes characteristic of microscopic organisms and our lack of experience-based intuition regarding how small organisms are constrained by many environmental variables. Until recently, the analysis of body size changes—along with changes in other metric variables—was undertaken with scant attention paid to the phylogenetic context within which such variations occurred. This approach assumes all taxa included in the study have equal phylogenetic relations to one another; obviously an incorrect assumption. Such an approach also leads to confusion of distinct concepts (e.g., describing decreases in the mean size of a multi-taxon assemblages as examples of ‘dwarfing’, which is a lineage-specific phenomenon) with consequent confusion over the correct interpretation of hypothesis tests. A recent study of planktonic foraminifera test size variation (Schmidt et al., 2004. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 212:159–180) recognized three time-ordered patterns of change that appeared to correlate with temperature and productivity fluctuations in the world ocean. However this study ignored the phylogenetic component of relations among species. The conclusions of this study may be valid in their own context, but they may also not fully express lineage specific trends. Certainly they cannot be used to test macroevolutionary hypotheses. A clade-specific, comparative investigation based on 17 different planktonic foraminifer lineages has identified five distinct modes of evolutionary test-size variation and allowed the relative frequency of these modes to be estimated. Results of this phylogeny-based analysis using the maximum parsimony analysis reveals important patterns undocumented by the Schmidt et al. study. Planktonic foraminifera are characterized by high lineage-specific phylogenetic test size differentials (= net increase-decrease in test size relative to ancestral conditions) during the Lower Cretaceous, but these rates fall off markedly throughout the Upper Cretaceous. Upper Cretaceous planktonic are large, but only because they evolved from large Anuár io do Inst i tu to de Geociências UFRJ ISSN 0101-9759 Vol. 29 1 / 2006 p. 392-393

Testing for Equality of Rates of Evolution

Testing for heterogeneous rates of discrete character evolution on phylogenies

Testing macro–evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies

Testing the relationship between morphological and molecular rates of change along phylogenies

Measuring Fit of Sequence Data to Phylogenetic Model: Gain of Power Using Marginal Tests

Comparing Evolutionary Rates Using An Exact Test for 2x2 Tables with Continuous Cell Entries

A Machine Learning Method for Detecting Autocorrelation of Evolutionary Rates in Large Phylogenies

Determinants of rate variation in mammalian DNA sequence evolution

The power of relative rates tests depends on the data

Evolution is coupled with branching across many granularities of life

Commonly used Bayesian diversification methods lead to biologically meaningful differences in branch-specific rates on empirical phylogenies

Evolutionary rate differences in trypanosomes

Estimating evolutionary rates using time-structured data: a general comparison of phylogenetic methods

Estimating Diversity Through Time using Molecular Phylogenies: Old and Species-Poor Frog Families are the Remnants of a Diverse Past

How to make any method "fail": BAMM at the kangaroo court of false equivalency

Phylogeny and the Evolutionary History of Planktonic Foraminiferal Test Size

Unidentifiable divergence times in rates-across-sites models

Testing peatland testate amoeba transfer functions: Appropriate methods for clustered training-sets

An improved small-sample statistical test for comparing the success rates of evolutionary algorithms

Noise leads to the perceived increase in evolutionary rates over short time scales

Measurably evolving populations