Abstract:Wildlife surveys often seek to determine the presence or absence of species at sites. Such data may be used in population monitoring, impact assessment, and species– habitat analyses. An implicit assumption of presence/absence surveys is that if a species is not detected in one or more visits to a site, it is absent from that site. However, it is rarely if ever possible to be completely sure that a species is absent, and false negative observation errors may arise when detection probabilities are less than 1. The detectability of species in wildlife surveys is one of the most important sources of uncertainty in determining the proportion of a landscape that is occupied by a species. Recent studies emphasize the need to acknowledge and incorporate false negative observation error rates in the analysis of site occupancy data, although a comparative study of the range of available methods for estimating detectability and occupancy is notably absent. The motivation for this study stems from the lack of guidance in the literature about the relative merits of alternative methods for estimating detection probabilities and site occupancy proportions from presence/absence survey data. Six approaches to estimating underlying detection probabilities and the proportion of sites occupied from binary observation data are reviewed. These include three parametric methods based on binomial mixtures, one nonparametric approach based on mark–recapture theory, and two approaches based on simplistic assumptions about occupancy rates. We compare the performance of each method using simulated data for which the “true” underlying detection rate is known. Simulated data were realized from a beta‐binomial distribution, incorporating a realistic level of variation in detection rates. Estimation methods varied in their precision and bias. The “binomial‐with‐added‐zeros” mixture model, estimated by maximum likelihood, was the least biased estimator of detection probability and, therefore, occupancy rate. We provide an Excel spreadsheet to execute all of the methods reviewed. Stand‐alone programs such as PRESENCE may be used to estimate all models including the “binomial with added zeros” model. Our findings lend support to the use of maximum likelihood methods in estimating site occupancy and detectability rates.

Minor Probability Events’ Detection in Big Data: An Integrated Approach With Bayes Detection and MIM

Improving Probability Estimation Through Active Probabilistic Model Learning.

Importance of Small Probability Events in Big Data: Information Measures, Applications, and Challenges

Message Importance Measure and Its Application to Minority Subset Detection in Big Data.

Focusing on a Probability Element: Parameter Selection of Message Importance Measure in Big Data

Rare Event Prediction Using Similarity Majority Under-Sampling Technique

A point process model for rare event detection

Energy-Efficient Coverage Based on Probabilistic Sensing Model in Wireless Sensor Networks.

A probabilistic approach to statistical QoS provision of event detection in sensor networks

Minimax-Optimal Bounds for Detectors Based on Estimated Prior Probabilities

Detecting weak changes in dynamic events over networks

Attention to the Variation of Probabilistic Events: Information Processing with Message Importance Measure.

Nearly optimal capture-recapture sampling and empirical likelihood weighting estimation for M-estimation with big data

Event Detection via Probability Density Function Regression

A Multivariate Based Event Detection Method and Performance Comparison with Two Baseline Methods

Distributed Bayesian Detection Under Unknown Observation Statistics

A modified importance sampling scheme for the estimation of detection system performance

PRECISION AND BIAS OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING POINT SURVEY DETECTION PROBABILITIES

Integrated Data Association and Bias Estimation in the Presence of Missed Detections

A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach for Source Detection in Networks.

An event detection method for social networks based on hybrid link prediction and quantum swarm intelligent